Say we have a policy that will create winners and losers. The principle that economists use to determine if that policy should be adopted says this: ----
if there are more winners than losers the policy should be adopted |
|
if the winners are able to compensate the losers the policy should be adopted |
|
if the welfare gains of the winners are more important to society than the welfare losses of the losers, the policy should be adopted |
|
all of these principles can be used, it depends on the specific situation |
All these criteria can be used to decide regarding the public policy.
This is because public policies can be adopted through all the given criteria. The first option highlights the welfare inabsolte terms. The second option is given in Kaldor Hicks criteria. It says that a policy can be adopted even if it creates net loss to the society. This is done when the winners are able to compensate the losers. The third option highlights the net walfare of the policy to the society. This is calculated by subtracting total cost from total benefit.
Thus, all the criteria can be used.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.