Question

What are two 2019 Supreme Court decisions in which the five conservative justices voted together against...

What are two 2019 Supreme Court decisions in which the five conservative justices voted together against the four liberal justices ?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

1) Racial gerrymandering case

Virginia republicans lost the case and democrats won the case. The court ruling invalidated state electoral districts they drew because they weakened the clout of black voters in violation the construction of USA

2) Manhattan community Access Corp. V. Halleck.

It was a dispute over a video that aired on Newyork city public access television channel that could have ramifications for social media and public radio stations. The court concluded that , public access tv channels in Manhattan are public forum's and the employees were alleged to be state actors taking action barred by the first amendment.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Which of the following is not a reason the Supreme Court would decide to take up...
Which of the following is not a reason the Supreme Court would decide to take up a case? A. Conflicting decisions among state courts of last resort. B. The case presents what the Court considers a political question. C. The case is of particular importance to the nation and/or historical significance. D. Conflicting decisions among the federal circuit courts.
What is the process by which the Supreme Court has made specific provisions of the bill...
What is the process by which the Supreme Court has made specific provisions of the bill of rights applicable not just to the federal government, but also to state and local governments? One of the tools the national government uses to coerce states into adopting national priorities involves——- between the various levels of government?
What was the name of the Supreme Court decision of 1803 that created the precedent of...
What was the name of the Supreme Court decision of 1803 that created the precedent of judicial review by ruling as unconstitutional part of the Judiciary Act of 1789? What was the name given to members of Congress, predominantly from the South and West, who aggressively pushed for war against England in 1811-12? The Rush-Bagot Agreement was between the United States and what other country?   The Adams-Onis Treaty was between the United States and what other country? Under the Missouri...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...
The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...
Case 114 - THE TRUNP TAJ HOTEL The Trunp Taj Hotel is a five-star hotel in...
Case 114 - THE TRUNP TAJ HOTEL The Trunp Taj Hotel is a five-star hotel in Bangkok, Thailand. The hotel was established fifteen years ago by a local consortium of investors and has been operated by a Thai general manager throughout this time. The hotel is one of Bangkok’s most prestigious hotels and its 700 employees enjoy the prestige of being associated with the hotel. The hotel provides good employee benefits, above-market rate salary, and job security. In addition, a...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....
What are 4 key things you learned about the topic from reading their paper? How does...
What are 4 key things you learned about the topic from reading their paper? How does the topic relate to you and your current or past job? Critique the paper in terms of the organization and quality. Team 3 answer questions above. Part I In today’s world we see fear among people when dealing with sexual harassment. This leads to people not reporting sexual harassment. A misconception about sexual harassment is that it’s only about touching and forcing other people...