Question

Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to P-values of approximately 0.05 and 0.0026.) In Castaneda the plaintiffs alleged that the method for selecting juries in a county in Texas was biased against Mexican Americans. For the period of time at issue, there were 180,650 persons eligible for jury duty, of whom 142,875 were Mexican Americans. Of the 892 people selected for jury duty, 338 were Mexican Americans.

(a) What proportion of eligible voters were Mexican Americans? Let this value be po. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)

(b) Let p be the probability that a randomly selected juror is a Mexican American. The null hypothesis to be tested is Ho: p = po. Find the value of p̂ for this problem, compute the z statistic, and find the P-value. What do you conclude? (A finding of statistical significance in this circumstance does not constitute a proof of discrimination. It can be used, however, to establish a prima facie case. The burden of proof then shifts to the defense.) (Use α = 0.01. Round your test statistic to two decimal places and your P-value to four decimal places.)

Z=

P-value=

(c) We can reformulate this exercise as a two-sample problem. Here we wish to compare the proportion of Mexican Americans among those selected as jurors with the proportion of Mexican Americans among those not selected as jurors. Let p1 be the probability that a randomly selected juror is a Mexican American, and let p2 be the probability that a randomly selected nonjuror is a Mexican American. Find the z statistic and its P-value. (Use α = 0.01. Round your test statistic to two decimal places and your P-value to four decimal places.)

Z=

P-value=

Homework Answers

Answer #1

(a) p0 = 142875/180650 = 0.79

(b)

n= 892

= -30.15

p value is less than 0.0001

the result is highly significant

We reject the null hypothesis

there is significant evidence to conclude that proportion of Mexican American selected is different from proportion of eligible Mexican American voters.

(c)

where

P = 0.79, Q=0.21  ,n1= 892,n2=179758

z= -30.20

p value is less than 0.0001

we reject the null hypothesis

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that proportion of MA in selected jury is different from proportion of MA in non jury  

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
9.) In the case of Casteneda v. Partida, it was found that during a period of...
9.) In the case of Casteneda v. Partida, it was found that during a period of 11 years in Hidalgo County, Texas, 870 people were selected for grand jury duty and 39% of them were Americans of Mexican ancestry. Among the people eligible for grand jury duty, 79.1% were Americans of Mexican ancestry. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against Americans of Mexican ancestry. Does the jury selection system appear to...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 867867...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 867867 people were selected for grand jury duty and 4040​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 80.880.8​% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.010.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion...
In a recent court case, it was found that during a period of 11 years 893...
In a recent court case, it was found that during a period of 11 years 893 people were selected for grand jury duty and 36​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 78.6% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 861people...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 861people were selected for grand jury duty and 38​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 78.3​% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.01significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion about the...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 855...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 855 people were selected for grand jury duty and 37​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 78.4​% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 881...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 881 people were selected for grand jury duty and 41​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 79.7​% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​statistic, P-value, conclusion about...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 877877...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 877877 people were selected for grand jury duty and 4141​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 78.578.5​% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.010.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion...
n a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 857...
n a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 857 people were selected for grand jury duty and 36​% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury​ duty, 80​% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null​ hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT