Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts
(a) The Sherman Act makes it illegal to "monopolize, and attempt to monopolize." Does
this imply that a person who owns a monopoly is breaking the law? If not, why not?
(b) In plain English, what actions does Section 3 of the Clayton Act prohibit?
A- An unlawful monopoly exists when a firm controls the market for a product or a service as it has obtained the power not because of the product or the service but because of suppressing competition by anticompetitive conduct. The Sherman act makes it a crime to monopolize anypart of the interstate commerce.
B- The Clayton act is a civil statue which prohibits mergers and acquisitions that likely to lessen competition. The government challenges the mergers that are likely to increase the prices . All the persons considering acquisitions and mergers above a certain size should notify the anti trust division and the federal trade commission. The Clayton act also prohibits other business practices which may lessen or harm the competition under particular and few circumstances .
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.