Environmental law has been characterized as "soft" law, in the sense that its proponents have experienced difficulties with getting States to enact "hard" laws to better control damage to the environment.
a) True
b) False
Soft law is nothing but a type of law that is actually not binding but it has a great legal relevant importance and in this regard environmental law is characterized as soft law in the international standards because certain policies can actually hinder economic growth if it is hard law and binding between two countries or various Nations and that is the reason why it has some legal importance but usually environmental laws are not binding in nature in order not to Hinder economic growth and that is the reason why
(a) True is the answer to this question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.