Question

Please answer as soon as possible. No explanation needed.

1. The implications of the KRACK Attack are that AES should no longer be used anywhere because it is now broken.

True

False

2. TLS 1.3 was recently adopted in an effort to streamline the communication and remove some of the back-and-forth communication.

True

False

3. Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) should still be used in an organization.

Ture

False

4. Attacks existed on WPA and WPA2 prior to the KRACK Attack

True

False

5. Wireless Network Signals typically broadcast in all directions, but attackers overhearing these signals is not something to be connected about.

True

False

Answer 1

Answer)

1) False

KRACK attack would be mostly working against any of the Wi-Fi clients that is certainly dependent on the range of the Wi-Fi for that of the target devices where the attacker would be using specific cards for Wi-Fi and for re-transmitting the session keys for triggering the re-installation approach.

2) True

It has a speed benefit and also the security enhancement, etc

3) True

It is an extension of the other security processes like we have MAC filtering.

4) True

It would work on particular clients with regards to Wi-Fi and as that of the Wi-Fi ranges for target devices.

Please comment in case you need any other inputs.
Please share a like if you find the answer helpful.
Thank you.