The text is talking about the valuation of lower of cost or market (net realizable value).
It provides an example of "Intel chips" in being devalued in the following way:
Intel Chips - [Qty] 1,000 [Cost per Item] $250 [Market Per Item] $200 [Lower of Cost or Market per item] $200 Total Lower of Cost or Market 1,000 x $200 = $200,000
This part makes sense. The text then indicates that the following
effects of the lower of cost or market write-down (of the $50,000
dollars) are as follows:
Effects of LCM Write Down | Current Period | Next Period (if sold) |
Costs of Goods Sold | Increase $50,000 | Decrease $50,000 |
Pretax Income | Decrease $50,000 | Increase $50,000 |
Ending Inventory on balance sheet | Decrease $50,000 | Unaffected |
Question: I am seeking an explanation as to why does the COGS and Pre-tax income change in opposition in the next period from the current period.
Please help with an explanation so that I may understand.
It is the ending stock to which the LCM is applied, as a result of which the ending stock will be stated at a lesser figure than the actual cost. The corollary of this is that, the COGS will be higher and pretax income will be lower. Please note that COGS = Beginning inventory+Purchases-Ending inventory. Lower ending inventory value will push up COGS.
The next year, the previous year'sending inventory (stated at a lower value) will become the beginning inventory. The effect of this (as per the above equation) will be opposite in nature.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.