Question

) Each year the ASX releases the top 10 charitable ASX companies. It is often argued...

  1. ) Each year the ASX releases the top 10 charitable ASX companies. It is often argued that companies have a social obligation to donate to charity.
    Discuss the above statement with reference to case law and statutory law (7.5 marks); and

  2. (b) Directors owe statutory and general law duties to the company. Shareholders however do not owe any duties to the company. Therefore are majority shareholders allowed to vote however they wish at a general meeting without considering the effect on the company or minority shareholders? Discuss with reference to the general law and the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (7.5 marks)

Homework Answers

Answer #1

company has the power of a natural person to make donations, does not mean that the power can be exercised without restriction. Numerous limitations exist in the way that companies can exercise their powers. In summary, the exercise by directors of the power of a company to make charitable donations can be limited by:

  • the constitution of the company;

  • the duties of directors under statute, common law and equity;

  • contractual obligations; and

  • any other applicable legislation (eg taxation laws prohibiting a company reducing its assets in a way which may adversely affect its capacity to pay tax and employee entitlements).
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Frank is the managing director of Super Athlete Pty Ltd (SA), a profitable company specialising in...
Frank is the managing director of Super Athlete Pty Ltd (SA), a profitable company specialising in general and specialist sporting equipment for men. The markets for SA’s products are men between the ages of 15 and 40 years. While at the Ice Hockey rink watching a game between the Adelaide Avalanche and the Sydney Bears, Frank chats to the coach of Adelaide Avalanche, Bob. Bob asks Frank whether his company would be interested in helping him to market a new...
QUESTION 1 10 MARKS Mick, Mark and Mike are directors and shareholders of MMM Hotels Pty....
QUESTION 1 10 MARKS Mick, Mark and Mike are directors and shareholders of MMM Hotels Pty. Ltd. Mick, the founder of the company, owns 80% of the shares while Mark and Mike each own 10% of the shares in the company. Mick is also a single director and shareholder of CAT Construction Pty Ltd. Mick convinced the board of MMM Hotels that the company could improve its position by refurbishing and expanding one of its hotels. The expansion required Council...
QUESTION 1 Mick, Mark and Mike are directors and shareholders of MMM Hotels Pty. Ltd. Mick,...
QUESTION 1 Mick, Mark and Mike are directors and shareholders of MMM Hotels Pty. Ltd. Mick, the founder of the company, owns 80% of the shares while Mark and Mike each own 10% of the shares in the company. Mick is also a single director and shareholder of CAT Construction Pty Ltd. Mick convinced the board of MMM Hotels that the company could improve its position by refurbishing and expanding one of its hotels. The expansion required Council approval and...
Select the statement that is untrue. The following factors in ASIC v Adler were taken into...
Select the statement that is untrue. The following factors in ASIC v Adler were taken into account when the court disqualified him as a director: a.Loss suffered by the shareholders. b.Dishonest conduct; c.Abuse of trust; d.His negotiation skills as a director; e.Loss suffered by the company; 1 points   QUESTION 2 Select the statement that is untrue. Remedies for breach of fiduciary duty are: a.Recission of contract. b.Constructive trust; c.Account for profits; d.Equitable compensation; e.Dejunction; 1 points   QUESTION 3 Are directors...
Government is cleaning up the way companies do business after accounting and governance scandals rocked investor...
Government is cleaning up the way companies do business after accounting and governance scandals rocked investor confidence and damaged the reputation of companies large and small. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 was enacted in response to the high-profile Enron and World Com financial scandals to protect shareholders and the public from accounting errors and fraudulent practices by organizations. One primary component of the SOX is the definition of which records are to be stored and for how long. For...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT