Question

A sample of 800 computer chips revealed that 40% of the chips do not fail in...

A sample of 800 computer chips revealed that 40% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that more than 35% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.

Ho:____________________

Ha:____________________

Homework Answers

Answer #1

To Test :-

H0 :- P1 = 0.35
H1 :- P1 > 0.35

P0 = 0.35
q0 = 1 - P0 = 0.65
n = 800
P = X / n = 320/800 = 0.4


Test Statistic :-
Z = ( P - P0 ) / √ ((P0 * q0)/n))
Z = ( 0.4 - 0.35 ) / √(( 0.35 * 0.65) /800))
Z = 2.965


Test Criteria :-
Reject null hypothesis if Z > Z(α)
Z(α) = Z(0.02) = 2.0537
Z > Z(α) = 2.965 > 2.0537, hence we reject the null hypothesis
Conclusion :- We Reject H0


Decision based on P value
P value = P ( Z > 2.965 )
P value = 0.0015
Reject null hypothesis if P value < α = 0.02
Since P value = 0.0015 < 0.02, hence we reject the null hypothesis
Conclusion :- We Reject H0

There is sufficient evidence to support the company's claim.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A sample of 800 computer chips revealed that 80% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 800 computer chips revealed that 80% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that over 76% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A sample of 1600 computer chips revealed that 50% of the chips fail in the first...
A sample of 1600 computer chips revealed that 50% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that under 53% fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A sample of 1300 computer chips revealed that 43% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 1300 computer chips revealed that 43% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that more than 40% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A sample of 1200 computer chips revealed that 50% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 1200 computer chips revealed that 50% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that more than 47% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A sample of 1500 computer chips revealed that 71% of the chips fail in the first...
A sample of 1500 computer chips revealed that 71% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that under 74% fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.  
A sample of 1500 1500 computer chips revealed that 26 % of the chips fail in...
A sample of 1500 1500 computer chips revealed that 26 % of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that  29 % fail in the first 1000 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to dispute the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A sample of 1600 computer chips revealed that 78% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 1600 computer chips revealed that 78% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature states that 77% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000hours of their use. The quality control manager wants to test the claim that the actual percentage that do not fail is more than the stated percentage. Is there enough evidence at the 0.02 level to support the manager's claim? State...
A sample of 1700 computer chips revealed that 43% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 1700 computer chips revealed that 43% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature states that 44% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The quality control manager wants to test the claim that the actual percentage that do not fail is different from the stated percentage. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the manager's claim?...
A sample of 1200 computer chips revealed that 49% of the chips fail in the first...
A sample of 1200 computer chips revealed that 49% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature states that 50% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The quality control manager wants to test the claim that the actual percentage that fail is below the stated percentage. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the manager's claim? Step 1 of 7: State the null...
A sample of 1100 computer chips revealed that 70% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 1100 computer chips revealed that 70% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature states that 73% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The quality control manager wants to test the claim that the actual percentage that do not fail is different from the stated percentage. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the manager's claim?