Question

A sample of 800 computer chips revealed that 80% of the chips do not fail in...

A sample of 800 computer chips revealed that 80% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that over 76% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

we have

Null hypothesis:- p = 0.76  

Alternate hypothesis:- (More than 76% dont fail in the first 1000 hours of their use)

calculation for z test statistic

z =

setting the values

we get

z =

Calculation for P value corresponding to the z value

we get

So, the p value is 0.004, which is less than 0.02 significance level

Thus, the p value is significant and we can reject the null hypothesis

So, we can conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that over 76% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
A sample of 800 computer chips revealed that 40% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 800 computer chips revealed that 40% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that more than 35% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario. Ho:____________________ Ha:____________________
A sample of 1600 computer chips revealed that 50% of the chips fail in the first...
A sample of 1600 computer chips revealed that 50% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that under 53% fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A sample of 1300 computer chips revealed that 43% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 1300 computer chips revealed that 43% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that more than 40% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A sample of 1200 computer chips revealed that 50% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 1200 computer chips revealed that 50% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that more than 47% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A sample of 1500 computer chips revealed that 71% of the chips fail in the first...
A sample of 1500 computer chips revealed that 71% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that under 74% fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to support the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.  
A sample of 1500 1500 computer chips revealed that 26 % of the chips fail in...
A sample of 1500 1500 computer chips revealed that 26 % of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature claimed that  29 % fail in the first 1000 1000 hours of their use. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to dispute the company's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.
A sample of 1600 computer chips revealed that 78% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 1600 computer chips revealed that 78% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature states that 77% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000hours of their use. The quality control manager wants to test the claim that the actual percentage that do not fail is more than the stated percentage. Is there enough evidence at the 0.02 level to support the manager's claim? State...
A sample of 1700 computer chips revealed that 43% of the chips do not fail in...
A sample of 1700 computer chips revealed that 43% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature states that 44% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The quality control manager wants to test the claim that the actual percentage that do not fail is different from the stated percentage. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the manager's claim?...
A sample of 1200 computer chips revealed that 49% of the chips fail in the first...
A sample of 1200 computer chips revealed that 49% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature states that 50% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The quality control manager wants to test the claim that the actual percentage that fail is below the stated percentage. Is there enough evidence at the 0.05 level to support the manager's claim? Step 1 of 7: State the null...
A sample of 900 computer chips revealed that 59% of the chips fail in the first...
A sample of 900 computer chips revealed that 59% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The company's promotional literature states that 62% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use. The quality control manager wants to test the claim that the actual percentage that fail is less than the stated percentage. Is there enough evidence at the 0.10 level to support the manager's claim? Step 1 of 7: State the...