Because ecological disruption can put native species in contact with humans and livestock, it is believed that an increased number of threatened species in an area leads to a greater risk of novel disease transmission. A team of ecologists is investigating this relationship and records the number of threatened species and the number of novel diseases in different biogeographical regions. The following is their data set:
Region | Number of threatened species | Number of novel diseases |
1 | 12 | 20 |
2 | 10 | 12 |
3 | 6 | 4 |
4 | 5 | 7 |
5 | 3 | 6 |
Mean | 7.2 | 9.8 |
SD | 3.7 | 6.4 |
(a) Calculate the correlation between these two variables.
(b) What are the slope and intercept for a linear regression model
with number of diseases as the response variable?
(c) Predict how many diseases we would expect for a region that has
10 threatened species.
(d) Can we conclude from this data that ecological disruption
causes an increase in the transmission of novel diseases?
Explain.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.