A manufacturer claims that the life span of its tires is 51,000 miles. You work for a consumer protection agency and you are testing these tires. Assume the life spans of the tires are normally distributed. You select 100 tires at random and test them. The mean life span is 50,844 miles. Assume σ = 800. Complete parts (a) through (c).
a.) Assuming the manufacturer's claim is correct, what is the probability that the mean of the sample is 50,844 miles or less?
b.) Using your answer from part (a), what do you think of the manufacturer's claim?
The claim is (inaccurate/accurate) because the sample mean (would/would not be) considered unusual since it (does/does not) lie within the range of a usual event, namely within (1/2/3) standard deviations of the mean of the sample means.
c.) Assuming the manufacturer's claim is true, would it be unusual to have an individual tire with a life span of 50,844 miles? Why or why not? (Yes/No), because 50,844 (lies/does not lie) within the range of a usual event, namely within (1/2/3) standard deviations of the mean for an individual tire.
a)
for normal distribution z score =(X-μ)/σ | |
here mean= μ= | 51000 |
std deviation =σ= | 800.0000 |
sample size =n= | 100 |
std error=σx̅=σ/√n= | 80.0000 |
probability = | P(X<50844) | = | P(Z<-1.95)= | 0.0256 |
b)
The claim is inaccurate because the sample mean would considered unusual since it does not lie within the range of a usual event, namely within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the sample means.
c)
No because 50,844 lies within the range of a usual event, namely within 2 standard deviations of the mean for an individual tire.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.