Lily began supervising an intern, Jack. A few months after
supervision began, Lily discovered that she would need to go on
medical leave. Because the leave would only be for about six weeks
and she was the only licensed mental health professional in the
office, she and Jack decided that he would be fine working without
her involvement until she got back. He would simply keep all the
reports she needed to sign on her desk, and she would sign them all
when she returned.
Jack felt very competent in his ability to carry on while Lily was
out until he conducted an intake assessment on a client who seemed
to be having some breaks from reality. Jack was unsure how to
determine if there really was psychosis occurring and what to do
about it. He tried to contact Lily but was unable to get in touch.
Anxious, he searched online for ideas on how to work with the new
client and tried out a few techniques during sessions. He reassured
himself that no matter what he did, ultimately Lily was responsible
anyway.
A week before Lily returned to work, the client was arrested as he
tried to “fly” off a building, convinced that he could fly without
difficulty. Upon being taken into custody, the client’s demeanor
concerned the police officer and he was taken to the emergency room
where an evaluation was conducted. It was determined that he was
indeed experiencing psychosis, and antipsychotic medication was
started.
Once the client was stable, he filed a complaint against Jack and
Lily with the state licensing board and threatened legal
action.
Understandably, Jack was scared and Lily was angry. She accused
Jack of practicing without her consent, stating that he was to have
continued with the clients he had when she left, not accept new
ones. She subsequently informed him that she would no longer be his
supervisor.
Jack was furious that he was put in the position to make decisions
on his own and did not receive support from his supervisor. Jack,
in turn, filed a complaint against Lily due to lack of
supervision.
Explain the ethical issues related to the supervisor and the
supervisee/student.
The ethical behavior of supervisors is especially important because of the multiple responsibilities supervisors assume. The importance is stressed by the facility differential that exists between supervisors and supervisees, and therefore the potential impact on supervisees and purchasers. The mental health field has long recognized the worth of moral standards for the follow of message and psychotherapy. The oversight relationship needs examination of multiple problems, and therefore the superordinate method should incorporate sensitivity to the role and responsibilities of each the supervisor and therefore the supervisee.
Ethics involved :
Direct and Vicarious Liability: If knowledgeable fails to follow
acceptable standards of follow and hurt to a consumer results, the
skilled will be command chargeable for the hurt caused.
Confidentiality: Supervision permits for third-party discussion of
medical care things. it's vital to recollect that the sort and
depth of debate allowed in oversight, is unethical in different
things. Supervisees should keep confidential all consumer info
except of the needs of oversight.
Supervisory competency essentially includes experience in
oversight, within the areas of follow supervised and in skilled
ethics.
Complications and considerations: the method of oversight may be a
difficult one with multiple components and other people concerned.
Supervisors are long-faced with a threefold responsibility of
protective the welfare of the consumer, mentoring supervisees in
their skilled development, and protective the interests of the
profession and public at massive (Storm & Todd, 1997)..
Clinical Oversight:Fulfilling superordinate duties needs
substantive oversight of supervisees’ clinical work.
Creating a secure Holding atmosphere: Although there sometimes is
associate critical part to the superordinate relationship, for the
supervisee to get most like the clinical oversight, and therefore
for the purchasers treated to receive the simplest care attainable,
the supervisee should understand the superordinate relationship to
be sufficiently safe to be ready to overtly share thoughts, ideas,
experiences, and feelings with the supervisor.
The underlying concern for a twin relationship between the
supervisor and supervisee is that the potential for “abuse of
power” because of the standing differential during this
relationship. If the boundaries within the superordinate
relationship aren't clear, the supervisee will interpret this as
permission to cross boundaries within the clinical realm then face
ramifications for making twin relationships with purchasers.
Iformed Consent:The thought of consent is being addressed last,
because it has the potential for impacting the ethical/legal
problems mentioned to the present purpose. consent is that the best
defense against the troublesome and confusing problems that arise
in oversight.
In the given case above, both...the superviser and the supervisee are wrong. Lily the superviser should not have gone on leave and left the clinic solely on her new intern/supervisee Jack. Lily knew that Jack is not experienced enough to operate the clinic on his own, and plus even if she was on the leave she must have been reachable/contactable. On the other hand, when Jack was not 100% sure about the situation of the new client, he should not have started the practice on him, it only worsened the situation of the client. He should have told the truth to the client or client's family member.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.