Mohandas Gandhi once wrote: "The golden rule of conduct, therefore, is mutual tolerance, seeing that we will never all think alike and we shall see Truth in fragments and from different angles of vision. conscience is not the same thing for all. whilst there, it is insufferable interference with everybody's freedom of conscience" How would an ethical subjectivist respond to Gandhi's words? is Gandhi arguing from a position of ethical subjectivism or ethical objectivism? Support your answer.
An ethical subjectivist will argue against this statement. Because, this statement will be putting subjectivism in danger. This is more of an universal principle of tolerance, since a principle is being followed on its own. If ethical relativism is followed, it would be violating ethical subjectivism. This statement goes with the fact that a belief is neither correct nor wrong. The point of view is neither of an ethical subjectivist or an ethical objectivist. Rather, it is ethical relativism, which states that there is no absolute truth or moral principles. Rather, situations would depend on people, cultural differences, and historical differences.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.