Question

Which agreements will a court enforce? Which agreement will a court not enforce? Why? But only...

Which agreements will a court enforce? Which agreement will a court not enforce? Why?

But only in relation to contracts, thanks

Homework Answers

Answer #1

A contract is nothing but the legal binding between two or more parties that enter into a legal agreement. The contract is valid if there is an offer made, offer accepted and the consideration to be paid by the promise made.

A valid contract has four requirements. They must consist of offer, acceptance, consideration and intention of legal consequences.

  • Offer – It is an act to do something or to pay an amount, if accepted, forms a valid contract. To make an offer there should be at least two parties or even more who can legally enter into a contract. It is important to specify the deadline for the acceptance of offer in order to avoid potential dispute between the parties or cancellation. An offer cannot take silence as a form of acceptance from the other party.
  • Acceptance – After the offer is made, there should be acceptance from the other party or parties to make it a valid contract. The party accept the offer if they are clear with the rules and regulation. If the parties are still under the negotiation process and there is no acceptance till now to the offer, then it is still not a contract. If a person to whom the offer is made has accepted only some of the terms or proposes some of the new terms, then it is the counter-offer that is made by the other party and is still not a valid contract.
  • Consideration – This forms the important part of the contract which consist of value such as money, payment or the cost of the promises of performance agreed to in a contract. A valid contract will have consideration part for both the parties where one party promises to do something in return for a promise from the other party to provide some benefit.
  • Intention of legal consequences – A contract is valid if the parties agree to enter into a contract legally and are aware that the agreement can be enforced by law. Sometimes the document may contain the words “subject to contract” or “without prejudice” which indicates that the things that are written are legal in nature.

An enforceable contract is a contract which is valid by the court. Any contract which is either made verbally or written must include specific element in order to make it legally enforceable in a court. If any of the elements is missing from the contract, then it will not be enforceable.

Unenforceable contracts are the contracts that are valid but the court will not enforce it. If the parties do not perform the valid contract, the court not compel them. These type of contracts will have ambiguous terms if one party has a voidable contract or if statute of limitation has expired or because of Doctrine of Laches.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Is a court likely to enforce a click-on agreement? briefly explain your answer
Is a court likely to enforce a click-on agreement? briefly explain your answer
Select one or more The doctrine of part performance a. allowed courts to enforce unwritten agreements...
Select one or more The doctrine of part performance a. allowed courts to enforce unwritten agreements concerning land b. is no longer valid c. allows a landowner to enforce rights which are unwritten regarding land d. was developed to allow for enforcement of agreements concerning land d. was developed to allow for enforcement of agreements concerning land
T/F A court may enforce an arbitration award if one of the parties refuses to comply...
T/F A court may enforce an arbitration award if one of the parties refuses to comply with the award T/F Construction contract disputes are often arbitration before the American Arbitration Association T/F One function of the US constitution is to protect individual rights by limiting the role of the government. T/F When there is a conflict between federal and state law, federal law prevails of the supremacy clause T/F The government's right to seize private property for public use extends...
The death of a promisor in a personal services contract discharges an agreement. However, if a...
The death of a promisor in a personal services contract discharges an agreement. However, if a promisor dies, other types of contracts live on. Is this sensible? Why? Would it be better to discharge all kinds of agreements if one of the parties passes away? Justify your response with specific reasons, facts, and examples.
QUESTION 17 A federal court would have diversity jurisdiction in which of the following cases: (A)...
QUESTION 17 A federal court would have diversity jurisdiction in which of the following cases: (A) A Michigan resident sues an auto company ( a Michigan corporation) for product liability resulting from an auto accident. (B) A California resident sues another California resident for negligence as a result of slipping and falling in the home of the second California resident. (C) An employee sues an employer for sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (D)...
Which of the following statements regarding contracts is​ INCORRECT? A. A contract is an agreement between...
Which of the following statements regarding contracts is​ INCORRECT? A. A contract is an agreement between two parties that creates enforceable rights or performance obligations. B. The process of revenue recognition is based on contracts that the entity has with outsiders. C. Identifying the contract with the customer is the first step of the revenue recognition model. D. Only written contracts are valid.
Smith and Jones entered into an agreement in which Smith agreed to sell is watch to...
Smith and Jones entered into an agreement in which Smith agreed to sell is watch to Jones. The two parties wrote all the terms of the contract on the back of an old envelope. They both signed the agreement. When the time came to execute the contract, Jones claimed he was not bound by the terms because the law required all contracts to be formally drawn up on pre-printed documents. Was he correct? Why or why not?
Unit 10 Discussion Topic 1 Discussion Topic The Noncompete Agreement and Course Reflection A non-compete agreement...
Unit 10 Discussion Topic 1 Discussion Topic The Noncompete Agreement and Course Reflection A non-compete agreement is an agreement some organizations ask their employees to sign restricting them from competing for a specific period of time and in a defined geographic area when they leave the organization. Companies use these agreements to provide protection of their operational information and customer relationships. The Unit 10 Discussion provides the opportunity to practice key elements involved with non-compete contracts including legal issues. Topic...
Under the People First Initiative, which of the following is TRUE about installment agreements and offers...
Under the People First Initiative, which of the following is TRUE about installment agreements and offers in compromise (OICs)? Taxpayers may not enter into new installment agreements between April 1, 2020, and July 15, 2020. Installment agreement payments due between April 1, 2020, and July 30, 2020 may be suspended. If a taxpayer has submitted an application for an OIC, they must file their 2018 and 2019 returns on or before July 15, 2020. Taxpayers may not submit a new...
How will the federal government enforce compliance in the Medicare Advantage program? Which two other Medicare...
How will the federal government enforce compliance in the Medicare Advantage program? Which two other Medicare regulations do you think are the most important for managed care organizations and why?