Question

Required Words: 1000 Subject: Organizaitonal Behavior Question 01: Explain in detail the difference between groups and...

Required Words: 1000

Subject: Organizaitonal Behavior

Question 01: Explain in detail the difference between groups and teams for any project in your organization.

Question 02: Summarize the positive and negative impact of individual behavior on overall group and team performances. (7marks)

.

.

Note: The assignment should be in a form of a comprehensive report and it must include the following points:

·         Proper introduction

·         Body of the report equipped with relevant knowledge and discussion

·         Conclusion of the report relevant to the discussion

·         Proper references.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer 01

Organizational Behaviour:

Organizational behavious is a study of human behaviour in Organisation settings, the interface between human behaviour and the organisation and the organisation itself.

Difference between Group and a Team-

  1. Purpose - Sense of feeling that the Group is made for administrative Purpose whereas in a team there is a feeling whatever the work can not be done by single individual is allocated to a team.
  2. Role Awareness - Each individual in a Group is concerned for his own task and least concerned with other person tasks whereas in a team everyone aware that each person contribute to the purpose or goal.
  3. Conflict resolution - In a Group, people have a tendency to point and raise a finger on others whereas in team members take responsibility of collaboration and feel a bond among themselves.
  4. Trust - There is always a element of suspicion in group causing members to be extra cautious whereas in a team trust leads to open commuincation where everyone contribution is valued.
  5. Management - Group members are told what have to do and what are they expected to be done whereas a team members are asked for their opinion on the goals.

Answer - 02

Positive impact

  • Motivate the other team members to perform
  • Sense of competition and better performance leads other members to perform well
  • set an example for others to work
  • assist other in their performance
  • Set the target for others to acheive

Negative Impact:

  • carelessness of one may affect the other employees performance
  • One team member can destroy the whole team
  • team building and sense of trust among them get in vain
  • set negative example
  • Project goal may fail

Conclusion:

Behavior as an individual or in a group or team is always analyzed by everyone in the Organization. It is analyzed at three different levels:

  1. Individual Level
  2. Group Level
  3. Organizational level
Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation....
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation. case:    W17400 APIGEE: PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE CHALLENGE OF GROWTH Ranjeet Nambudiri, S. Ramnarayan, and Catherine Xavier wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be...
Please summarize the below article in approximately 100 words: Monumental function in British Neolithic burial practices...
Please summarize the below article in approximately 100 words: Monumental function in British Neolithic burial practices Ian Kinnes The high-risk rate of survival for the non-megalithic series of Neolithic funerary monuments, recently re-emphasized by Piggott (1973: 34), introduces a further variable into the deductive study of burial practices. In Britain and Europe the overall distribution of monumental forms present both lacunae and a marked preponderance of cairns over earthen mounds which are in ill accord with the known or predicted...
CASE STUDY ON LEADERSHIP/ Aidensfield hospital currently faces major problems with staff, management, general performance and...
CASE STUDY ON LEADERSHIP/ Aidensfield hospital currently faces major problems with staff, management, general performance and service quality. It is conceivable that these problems are related to the ‘leadership’ styles adapted by those in charge. The senior management have proposed some changes within the organisation to hopefully make improvements but making such decisions requires an in-depth understanding of what is going wrong and why. Leadership as a concept is often considered in isolation when in reality, it is coherent with...
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues?...
What tools could AA leaders have used to increase their awareness of internal and external issues? ???ALASKA AIRLINES: NAVIGATING CHANGE In the autumn of 2007, Alaska Airlines executives adjourned at the end of a long and stressful day in the midst of a multi-day strategic planning session. Most headed outside to relax, unwind and enjoy a bonfire on the shore of Semiahmoo Spit, outside the meeting venue in Blaine, a seaport town in northwest Washington state. Meanwhile, several members of...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT