Researchers mention that the “opportunity window” was likely influenced by the spotlight on redevelopment, crime reduction and addressing inequities in the area that had recently been initiated. Additionally, a similar program/policy initiative had been implemented in a nearby area. How if at all, do either of these factors dilute the validity of the studies findings? If yes, would there be any way to mitigate that?
Windows of opportunity(if that is what you are talking about) are basically trials on which patients recieve on or more new compounds between their cancer diagnosis and treatment. But they have many downsides:-a) potential safety b) delayed treatment starting c) logistical issues d)probable lack of patient benefits.
To mitigate this, proper planning and interventions should be planned beforehand. Better knowledge and understanding of the prognosis should be present.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.