Question

Royal Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...

Royal Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the project with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value will be lost if the IRR method is used. WACC: 10.25% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$4,100 $1,500 $1,520 $1,540 $1,560 CFL -$8,600 $3,000 $3,036 $3,072 $3,108 A. Value lost if use the IRR criterion: $298.71. B. Value lost if use the IRR criterion: 0 C. Value lost if use the IRR criterion: $119.79 D. Value lost if use the IRR criterion: $149.36

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Irr of project 1:

-4100+1500/(1+IRR)+1520/(1+IRR)^2+1540/(1+IRR)^3+1560/(1+IRR)^4=0

=>IRR=18.06%

IRR of Project 2: -8600+3000/(1+IRR)+3036/(1+IRR)^2+3072/(1+IRR)^3+3108/(1+IRR)^4=0

=>IRR=15.58%

Hence, according to IRR criterion, we will choose Project 1

NPV of Project 1=-4100+1500/1.1025+1520/1.1025^2+1540/1.1025^3+1560/1.1025^4=716.09

NPV of Project 2=-8600+3000/1.1025+3036/1.1025^2+3072/1.1025^3+3108/1.1025^4=1014.80

Hence, we should have chosen Project 2 but we chose Project 1 so value lost=1014.80-716.09=298.71

Option A

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
ASaark Telecom is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
ASaark Telecom is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Kosovski Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Kosovski Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and are not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 6.25% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,050 $675 $650 CFL -$1,050 $360 $360 $360...
Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the MIRR. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher MIRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the NPV of the chosen project versus the...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note...
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note...
ast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
ast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 8.75% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 10.75% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,100...