Question

Kosovski Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...

Kosovski Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and are not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost.

WACC: 6.25%
0 1 2 3 4
CFS -$1,050 $675 $650
CFL -$1,050 $360 $360 $360 $360
a. $35.69
b. $29.26
c. $34.82
d. $26.33
e. $31.31

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Present value of cash flow of Project S ÷

= 675(1+0.0625)1 + 650(1+0.0625)2 - 1,050

=675× 0.94117 + 650 × 0.88581 - 1,050

=635.28975 + 575.7765 - 1,050

=$161.06625

Present value of cash flow of Project L÷

= 360(1+0.0625)1 + 360(1+0.0625)2 + 360(1+0.0625)3 + 360(1+0.0625)4 - 1,050

=360 × 0.94117 + 360 × 0.88581 + 360 × 0.83371 + 360 × 0.78466 -  1,050

=338.8212 + 318.8916 + 300.1356 + 282.4776 - 1,050

=$190.326

The difference of both the NPV is

$(190.326 - 161.06625)

=$ 29.25975

=$29.26

The correct answer is option b. i.e. $29.26

NOTE ÷

As nothing mentioned in the question about rounding off, the present value annuity factor is rounded to 5 decimals. And the final answer to two decimals.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
ASaark Telecom is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
ASaark Telecom is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 10.75% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,100...
ast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
ast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 8.75% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS...
Royal Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Royal Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the project with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value...
Tinner Corp. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Tinner Corp. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV?   WACC:...
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note...
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects...
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note...