Question

Upon writing off the remaining accounts receivable balance of $3,000 on a $9,000 bill on December...

Upon writing off the remaining accounts receivable balance of $3,000 on a $9,000 bill on December 31, 2016, a clinic received $500 toward payment on the account on Feb 10, 2017. The letter attached to the check indicated that the estate of Patient X had been probated and final disbursements from the estate were being made to the known creditors. Your accountant has deposited the $500 check and has indicated that the check would be recorded to the non-operating income account. You are the Hospital’s auditor and have come across this transaction during a review of the March 2017 financial statements. Is this transaction correct? If not, describe the process of how you would have received this payment.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Treatment of recovery of Bad debts written off earlier is not correct.

Accounts receivable are created when sales are made on credit .sales is a part of normal operations of business(operating activity) .In case if any of the receivables is not recoverable ,it is written off as bad debt .

Any amount recovered out of bad debt written off afterwards will be treated as operating income as that amount represents that part of income which we considered as non receoverable .

In the given situation , amount recovered as disbursement from estate of receivables is to be treated as operating income as such operations are generated in ordinary course of business (that is from operations of business).

b)The amount recovered should be (added to operating income) and subtracted from non operating income.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Stine Inc. Trial Balance as at 31 December 2017 Account Title Debit Credit $ $ Share...
Stine Inc. Trial Balance as at 31 December 2017 Account Title Debit Credit $ $ Share Capital 2,000,000 Plant, property and equipment (net) 1,800,000 Accumulated depreciation - Equipment 50,000 Inventory 800,000 Provision for bad debts 300,000 Trade creditors 65,000 Trade debtors 600,000 Retained profits at 1 January 2017 535,000 Revaluation surplus at 1 January 2017 200,000 Cash 800,000 Sales 2,000,000 Cost of sales 600,000 Other operating expenses 50,000 Tax expense 300,000 Wages expense 200,000 Total 5,150,000 5,150,000 The following transaction...
Stine Inc. Trial Balance as at 31 December 2017 Account Title Debit Credit $ $ Share...
Stine Inc. Trial Balance as at 31 December 2017 Account Title Debit Credit $ $ Share Capital 2,000,000 Plant, property and equipment (net) 1,800,000 Accumulated depreciation - Equipment 50,000 Inventory 800,000 Provision for bad debts 300,000 Trade creditors 65,000 Trade debtors 600,000 Retained profits at 1 January 2017 535,000 Revaluation surplus at 1 January 2017 200,000 Cash 800,000 Sales 2,000,000 Cost of sales 600,000 Other operating expenses 50,000 Tax expense 300,000 Wages expense 200,000 Total 5,150,000 5,150,000 The following transaction...
Items 1 through 10 represent possible errors and fraud that an auditor suspects are present. The...
Items 1 through 10 represent possible errors and fraud that an auditor suspects are present. The accompanying List of Auditing Procedures that the auditor would consider performing to gather evidence concerning possible errors and fraud. For each item, select one or two procedures, as indicated, that the auditor most likely would perform to gather evidence in support of that item and explain why you choose. Possible misstatements due to error and fraud 1. The auditor suspects that the controller wrote...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions...
During the trial, lawyers for the accused said that the men believed that the accounting decisions they made were appropriate at the time, and that the accounting treatment was approved by Nortel’s auditors from Deloitte & Touche. Judge Marrocco accepted these arguments. Marrocco added he was “not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt” that the trio (i.e., Dunn, Beatty, and Gollogly) had “deliberately misrepresented” financial results. Given the facts of the case, do you believe Judge Marrocco’s decision was justified? Explain....