Question

Suppose that there are two possible uses for land: agriculture and forestry. How should land be...

Suppose that there are two possible uses for land: agriculture and forestry. How should land be allocated across these two uses?

  • All answers are correct.
  • Until the present value of benefits to society from forestry are zero.
  • Until the present value of benefits to society from agriculture are zero.
  • Until the present value of benefits to society from agriculture and forestry are equal.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

There are two possible uses for land, i.e., agriculture and forestry.

The land should be allocated to a particular purpose (i.e., for agriculture or forestry) untill the net present benefits are equal to zero.

Hence, the land will be use only for forestry Until the present value of benefits to society from forestry are zero.

The land will be use only for agriculture Until the present value of benefits to society from agriculture are zero

The land will allocated between the forestry and agriculture Until the present value of benefits to society from agriculture and forestry are equal.

Answer: Option (A) i.e., all answers are correct

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
1. Let’s apply the economic model of land allocation:Assume that a fixed amount of land can...
1. Let’s apply the economic model of land allocation:Assume that a fixed amount of land can be used for (i) residential development, (ii)agriculture and (iii)wilderness. In the case of residential development, B+2D=10 gives the relationship between net benefit per acre, B and distance to the center of the town, D. The last two equations 8B + 5D = 40 and 10B + 3D = 30 give the same relationship in the case of agriculture and wilderness, respectively. To find the...
Suppose a proposed public policy could result in three possible outcomes: (1) present value of net...
Suppose a proposed public policy could result in three possible outcomes: (1) present value of net benefits of $4million, (2) present value of net benefits of $1million (3) present value of net benefits of -$10,000,000 (a loss). Suppose the society is risk-neutral and the probability of each of these outcomes occurring is, 0.85, 0.10 and 0.05 respectively, should this policy be pursued or cancelled? Explain why or why not? If society is more risk averse, how would the probabilities of...
1. Use the specific-factors model to answer question 1. Assume that there are two industries, agriculture...
1. Use the specific-factors model to answer question 1. Assume that there are two industries, agriculture and manufacturing. The agricultural industry uses labor and land as inputs while the manufacturing industry uses labor and capital as inputs. The production function for each good is as follows: Agriculture Production Function Land              Labor          QA            20              0                0 20              1               12         20              2               22         20              3              30         20              4              36         20              5              40 20              6               42         Manufacturing Production Function Capital        Labor             QM            20             ...
Suppose there are two possible income distributions in a society of ten people. In the first...
Suppose there are two possible income distributions in a society of ten people. In the first distribution, nine people have incomes of $30,000 and one person has an income of $10,000. In the second distribution, all ten people have incomes of $25,000. If the society had the first income distribution, the utilitarian would argue that the marginal utility of income for the person with an income of $10,000 is (lower/higher) than the marginal utility of income for someone with an...
Suppose there are two possible income distributions in a society of ten people. In the first...
Suppose there are two possible income distributions in a society of ten people. In the first distribution, nine people have incomes of $30,000 and one person has an income of $10,000. In the second distribution, all ten people have incomes of $25,000. If the society had the first income distribution, the utilitarian would argue that the marginal utility of income for the person with an income of $10,000 is [lower/higher] than the marginal utility of income for someone with an...
Consider two possible investments whose payoffs are completely independent of one another. Both investments have the...
Consider two possible investments whose payoffs are completely independent of one another. Both investments have the same expected value and standard deviation. You have $1,000 to invest between the two investments. Now suppose that 10 independent investments are available rather than just two. Would it matter if you spread your $1,000 across these 10 investments rather than two? Select the correct response below A) Yes. The gains from spreading your investments would be larger if you spread the $1,000 across...
Presented below are two independent situations: (a) On January 1, 2017, Bridgeport Inc. purchased land that...
Presented below are two independent situations: (a) On January 1, 2017, Bridgeport Inc. purchased land that had an assessed value of $383,000 at the time of purchase. A $508,000, zero-interest-bearing note due January 1, 2020, was given in exchange. There was no established exchange price for the land, nor a ready fair value for the note. The interest rate charged on a note of this type is 12%. Determine at what amount the land should be recorded at January 1,...
On July 1, 2020, Skysong Inc. made two sales. 1. It sold land having a fair...
On July 1, 2020, Skysong Inc. made two sales. 1. It sold land having a fair value of $909,890 in exchange for a 4-year zero-interest-bearing promissory note in the face amount of $1,431,725. The land is carried on Skysong's books at a cost of $594,900. 2. It rendered services in exchange for a 3%, 8-year promissory note having a face value of $409,660 (interest payable annually). Skysong Inc. recently had to pay 8% interest for money that it borrowed from...
On July 1, 2020, Swifty Inc. made two sales. 1. It sold land having a fair...
On July 1, 2020, Swifty Inc. made two sales. 1. It sold land having a fair value of $905,690 in exchange for a 4-year zero-interest-bearing promissory note in the face amount of $1,425,116. The land is carried on Swifty's books at a cost of $594,100. 2. It rendered services in exchange for a 3%, 8-year promissory note having a face value of $408,280 (interest payable annually). Swifty Inc. recently had to pay 8% interest for money that it borrowed from...
3. This problem looks at problem 2 from another angle. Again, there are 100 acres in...
3. This problem looks at problem 2 from another angle. Again, there are 100 acres in a jurisdiction, depicted below. The land can be used as subdivided residential land, or for farming. The value of land in each use is as follows. Residential Development: 1,000 – 10D Farming: 250 The notation D indicates developed acres and the notation F indicates farmed acres. Farm land provides environmental benefits that are homogenous across the landscape, and equal to 50 per acre that...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT