Suppose there are two possible income distributions in a society of ten people. In the first distribution, nine people have incomes of $30,000 and one person has an income of $10,000. In the second distribution, all ten people have incomes of $25,000.
If the society had the first income distribution, the
utilitarian would argue that the marginal utility of income for the
person with an income of $10,000 is (lower/higher)
than the marginal utility of income for someone with an income of
$30,000, so income(should /should not) be
redistributed.
Rawls considers the second distribution to be more
equitable, while Nozick considers neither
distribution to be more equitable.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.