Question

Please verify the my solutions below. These are practice examples and I am unsure if I...

Please verify the my solutions below. These are practice examples and I am unsure if I answered them correctly.

Please explain any discrepancies in detail and please explain any calculations or formulas. For parts C&D, please add detail, if my answers are not sufficient.

Practice # 17. Considering Purchasing Power Parity and the Law of One Price:

part a: Assume that the current price of a Big Mac in the United States today is $2.75. Assume also that the current price of a Big Mac in Malaysia is 6.5000 ringgits and that the current USDMYR exchange rate is 3.0250 ringgits per $. What is the implied PPP of the USD?

Answer:

  • 6.50000/2.75000 = 2.3636
  • 2.3636 ringgits per USD

part b: Using the assumptions above, what is the under (-) / over (+) valuation of Malaysian ringgits versus the U.S. dollar in percentage terms?

Answer:

  • (2.3636-3.025)/3.025 = -0.2186
  • 21.86% under-valued

part c: What are the long-term implications associated with your answer to part b.?

Answer:

  • Over the long term, the exchange rates should normalize and the currency should no longer be overvalued.
  • Over the long term, demand for ringgits will increase and the exchange rate should move toward the implied PPP rate.

d. Describe the short-falls, if any, of PPP as a predictor of currency exchange rates?

Answer:

  • Commodities such as big macs cannot be traded between countries
    • Prices are influenced by several factors in each country, including real estate, rental rates, and taxes
  • The PPP does not take into account any transaction costs of the exchange.
  • Unless you are dealing with a universal currency, there will always been transaction costs.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

a) Implied PPP rate of USD = Cost in ringgits / Cost in USD = 6.5 / 2.75 = 2.36 ringgits/USD

b) Actually, 1$ = 3.025 ringgits

PPP rate , 1$ = 2.36 ringgits

so, undervaluation of ringgits = [(2.36 - 3.025)/3.025]* 100 = -21.85%

c) Over the long term, demand for ringgits will increase and the exchange rate should move toward the implied PPP rate. The purchasing power will become the same in both countries and no currency will remain undervalued.

d) Commodities such as big macs cannot be traded between countries. Prices are influenced by several factors in each country, including real estate, rental rates, and taxes. The PPP does not take into account any transaction costs of the exchange. Unless you are dealing with a universal currency, there will always been transaction costs.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Please show all calculations and explain the answer in detail. If using Excel please show data....
Please show all calculations and explain the answer in detail. If using Excel please show data. practice #7 If the current exchange rate is 105 Japanese yen per U.S. dollar, the price of a Big Mac hamburger in the United States is $3.41, and the price of a Big Mac hamburger in Japan is 380 yen, then other things equal, the Big Mac hamburger in Japan is ______________ (over-valued/under-valued/fairly-valued).
Some people read tea leaves to predict the future, The Economist magazine prefers hamburgers. The magazine...
Some people read tea leaves to predict the future, The Economist magazine prefers hamburgers. The magazine started the Big Mac Index in 1986 as a light-hearted guide to test whether currencies are at their “correct” exchange rate based on the Law of One Price. Under the Law of One Price, the price of the Big Mac should be the same if its local price is converted into dollars at the current exchange rates. Currently, the average price of a Big...
4. The Economist publishes annually the ”hamburger standard” by which they compare the prices of the...
4. The Economist publishes annually the ”hamburger standard” by which they compare the prices of the McDonalds Corporation Big Mac hamburger around the world. The index estimates the exchange rates for currencies based on the assumption that the burgers in question are the same across the world and therefore, the price should be the same. A Big Mac costs USD2.54 in the United States and JPY294 in Japan. The current exchange rate is 124 Japanese yen per U.S. dollar. (a)...
Question Set 7: Purchasing Power Parity and the Law of One Price The table below contains...
Question Set 7: Purchasing Power Parity and the Law of One Price The table below contains the price of a Big Mac in different countries in the world in January 2017[1]. You will use the information in the table to explain how Big Macs would be traded between countries if Big Macs could be traded among countries. Country Big Mac Price Purchasing Power Parity Exchange Rate Actual Exchange Rate Actual Price in U.S. Dollars United States $5.10 (U.S.) 1.0 U.S....
Question 1 (1 point) Which of the following can cause relative PPP to NOT hold in...
Question 1 (1 point) Which of the following can cause relative PPP to NOT hold in the short run? Question 1 options: frictionless markets state-sponsored monopolies types of labor and unique skill sets than can only be found in one area or certain areas shipping costs Question 2 (1 point) If relative PPP holds, absolute PPP must hold. Question 2 options: True False Question 3 (1 point) In 2019, the US had the highest nominal GDP in the world, before...
For question 5 I chose c... question 6 stems off of question 5 directly, so I...
For question 5 I chose c... question 6 stems off of question 5 directly, so I would like clarification on whether my question 5 is right, and then come to a question 6 answer. QUESTION 5 The central bank of Saudi Arabia (Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority or SAMA) has pegged (fixed) the country’s currency, Saudi riyal (SAR), to the US dollar (USD) at the rate of 3.75 SAR/$. To implement this policy, the SAMA prints money (SAR) and buys USD...
Please edit, rephrase or add something to the following part of my report. Question: Given the...
Please edit, rephrase or add something to the following part of my report. Question: Given the proposed expansion, that the current directors are not keen on putting in more capital – should the company consider new private equity or even perhaps listing on the stock exchange. Answer: Going to the stock market by way of initial public offering would be the best option when the existing Directors are not interested in further equity investment. As a second option, it could...
answer all questions please Cerner Corporation announced a first-come, first-serve stock repurchase offer to its shareholders...
answer all questions please Cerner Corporation announced a first-come, first-serve stock repurchase offer to its shareholders – the company agreed to repurchase 2,653,780 shares of its common stock in exchange for total consideration of $173,434,000. Cerner had 329,641,500 total shares outstanding before the redemption. You acquired 16,482,075 shares of Cerner's stock two years ago for $20/share. You were the only shareholder to participate in the repurchase offer and Cerner agreed to redeem the total number of shares directly from you....
Can someone please provide the solutions. No explanation needed, just the answers so I can double...
Can someone please provide the solutions. No explanation needed, just the answers so I can double check my work.      2.   Firms with tangible long-term assets and less predictable cash flows, such as auto manufacturers and steel companies, whose sales vary with changes in economic conditions, tend to use a. a more nearly equal mix of long-term debt and shareholders’ equity financing. b. a greater amount of long-term debt [80%] than shareholders’ equity financing [20%]. c. a smaller amount of...
Please read the article and answer these questions. Thanks. Article: TESTING THE GLOBAL CENTRAL BANK SWAP...
Please read the article and answer these questions. Thanks. Article: TESTING THE GLOBAL CENTRAL BANK SWAP NETWORK In the last few weeks, the ECB has been drawing on its liquidity swap line with the Fed, first $308 million for a week, then $658 million for a week, and last week back down to $358 million. What’s that about? It’s not such a large amount. Bank of Japan borrowed more in the past, $810 million in March and $1528 million in...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT