Why might it make sense to allow for the federal government to have deficits in some years and surpluses in others?
Time-series graphs highlight one striking justification to account for deficits: the federal government spent much more than it took in during World War II. A government, like a family, sometimes faces unforeseen emergencies which require it to borrow. Had the United States been limited at the time of World War II by a balanced budget obligation, the outcome of the war may have been very different. For a second purpose, the family metaphor is relevant: borrowing enables an individual to pay for a durable good that is consumed over time.
For most people, it makes sense to take out a mortgage to buy a home, because that investment provides benefits for several years. Likewise, many policy programs offer long-term benefits. Surpluses and deficits may also have positive macroeconomic consequences, such as helping a fragile economy stabilize.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.