At a student café, there are equal numbers of two types of customers with the following values. The café owner cannot distinguish between the two types of students because many students without early classes arrive early anyway (i.e., she cannot price-discriminate).
Students with Early Classes |
Students without Early Classes |
|
---|---|---|
Coffee | 73 | 63 |
Banana | 53 | 103 |
The marginal cost of coffee is 5 and the marginal cost of a banana is 20.
The café owner is considering three pricing strategies:
1. | Mixed bundling: Price bundle of coffee and a banana for 166, or just a coffee for 73. |
2. | Price separately: Offer coffee at 63, price a banana at 103. |
3. | Bundle only: Coffee and a banana for 126. Do not offer goods separately. |
Assume that if the price of an item or bundle is no more than exactly equal to a student's willingness to pay, then the student will purchase the item or bundle.
For simplicity, assume there is just one student with an early class, and one student without an early class.
Price Strategy |
Revenue from Pricing Strategy |
Cost from Pricing Strategy |
Profit from Pricing Strategy |
---|---|---|---|
1. Mixed Bundling | |||
2. Price Separately | |||
3. Bundle Only |
Pricing strategy yields the highest profit for the café owner.
Consider the given problem here there are two students, “early classes” and “without early classes”. Now, their willingness to pay are given in the question.
1. Now, under “mixed bundling”, => students without early classes will buy the bundle having willingness to pay exactly equal to “166” and students with early classes will buy only “coffee”. Since “students with early classes” have total willingness pay for these both goods “73 + 53 = 126 < 166”. So, the “TR = 166 + 73 = 239”, “TC = 2*5 + 20 = 30”, because only “2” units of “coffee” and 1 unit of “banana” will be sold. So, “profit is given by, “ 239 – 30 =209 ”.
2.
Now, under “Price Separately”, => students without early classes will buy both goods having total willingness to pay exactly equal to “63*2” and students with early classes will buy only “coffee”. Since “students with early classes” have lower willingness pay for “banana”, => only buy “coffee”. So, the “TR = 2*63+103 = 229”, “TC = 2*5 + 20 = 30”, because only “2” units of “coffee” and 1 unit of “banana” will be sold. So, “profit is given by, “ 229 – 30 =199”.
3.
Finally, under “Bundle only”, => both the students will buy the bundle having both of the goods, because
“students without early classes” more willingness to pay for the bundle, 126 > 166, and ”students with early classes” will also buy the bundle having willing ness to pay exactly the price of the bundle. So, the “TR = 126*2 = 252”, “TC = 2*5 + 2*20 = 50”, because only “2” units of “coffee” and 2 units of “banana” will be sold. So, “profit is given by, “ 252 – 50 = 202”.
Consider the following table.
Price Strategy |
Revenue from Pricing Strategy |
Cost from Pricing Strategy |
Profit from Pricing Strategy |
1. Mixed Bundling |
166 + 73 = 239 |
2*5 + 20 = 30 |
239 – 30 =209 |
2. Price Separately |
2*63+103=229 |
2*5 + 20 = 30 |
229 – 30 =199” |
3. Bundle Only |
126*2=252 |
2*5 + 2*20 = 50 |
252 – 50 = 202 |
So, we can see the profit under the 1st strategy is more compared to the other strategy, => “mixed bundle”.
hit a like if to get more responces from me.thanks in advance
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.