Assume that a monopolist considering to spend 500.000 usd on
large campaign to promote the their products.
The demand curves are defined by
p = 150 - 3q, where q is the output-quantity in 1000-usd. By
executing the campaign the firm expects the new demand-curves to
be
p = 400 - 4q.
Their total cost are c(q) = 30q, and the 500.000 usd are not
included in this.
a) If the expectations regarding the demand-curves are correct, is
it beneficial for the company to do the campaign?
------------------------------------------
I'm really fairly certain that it is beneficial but I'm uncertain how to explain it using the theory of microeconomics.
Total cost including campaign cost (TC) = 500 + 30q
Marginal cost (MC) = dTC/dq = 30
Monopolist will maximize profit (or minimize loss) by equating Marginal revenue (MR) with MC.
Before the campaign,
Total revenue (TR) = p x q = 150q - 3q2
MR = dTR/dq = 150 - 6q
Equating with MC,
150 - 6q = 30
6q = 120
q = 20
p = 150 - (3 x 20) = 150 - 60 = 90
TR = 90 x 20 = 1,800
TC = 30 x 20 = 600
Profit = TR - TC = 1,800 - 600 = 1,200
After the campaign,
New TR = 400q - 4q2
New MR = 400 - 8q
Equating with MC,
400 - 8q = 30
8q = 370
q = 46.25
p = 400 - (4 x 46.25) = 400 - 185 = 215
TR = 215 x 46.25 = 9,943.75
TC = 500 + (30 x 46.25) = 500 + 1,387.5 = 1,887.5
New profit = 9,943.75 - 1,887.5 = 8,056.5
Since profit will increase after campaign, the campaign is beneficial.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.