Question

3. The City of Lakewood has a test that it uses to screen potential applicants for the position of Fireman.

It consists of 50-yard dash, scaling a ladder (for time), carry a heavy pack for 100 yards, and all of this in a firefighting equipment…. There is also a test using the fire axe to break thorough a door (also timed).

The total score is used to screen applicants (100-point scale). The cut off score is 70.

Many women applicants complain that the gloves and boots are too big and hurts their times…in fact none have passed the test.

The City maintains the test is representative of the job of firefighter. It also, use an IQ test that it bought from a local vender.

Analyze and discuss and decide the case. What type of validity are they using? Explain it.

Is this the appropriate type or should they use another? Is reliability an issue here? Why or why not.

Explain and defend you answer. Any suggestions for improving the test and/or validation procedure?

Answer 1

Here, Criterion related legitimacy is utilized, which inspect the capacity of the measure to anticipate a variable that I designated as a standard. This is absolutely appropriate where applicants are need to be screened on basis of certain criterion, and therefore, their ability need to be verified.

Unwavering quality is an issue here, on the grounds that, the candidates ought to be permitted to perform under rehashed comparative circumstance and consistency of their result should be estimated to check whether they create same outcomes or not. If they produce same or nearly Sam results then the test will b concluded to be highly reliable.