Question

How do the following three states (Georgia, California, and Washington DC) compare and contrast to the others in policies relative to the local governments' handling of homelessness in their cities?

II. Comparative Analysis, Policy: Compare each policy outcome within each state. In other words, how did the outcome of addressing the policy issue yield differences in results relative to variations in Local governments?

Answer 1

1. Georgia:

The ascent of neoliberal administration has drastically changed the way that individuals who are destitute in intensely populated urban communities are managed and treated around the United States. Neoliberal administration is the advancement of human headway through monetary development. The most acknowledged thought of accomplishing this is by pushing towards a free market economy which flourishes off of not having a lot of government or state cooperation. During the 1970s and 1980s, Atlanta, Georgia was one of these urban areas where organizations were extremely dynamic in their endeavors to diminish homelessness in the soul of this thought. The Central Atlanta Progress (CAP) was one of the most remarkable voices in Atlanta advancing these kind of activities. For instance, their first significant activity was to condemn homelessness. They considered the to be populace as a danger to open well being. Be that as it may, their endeavors were met with clashed reactions from police and Georgian residents because of the huge size and statistic cosmetics of the destitute populace in Atlanta. Dominant part of this current gathering's cosmetics were dark guys. In addition, Atlanta's first dark city hall leader, Maynard Jackson, had been as of late chosen into office. Having effectively chosen a dark male into office, the subject of race and governmental issues was unmistakable in the psyches of numerous Georgian residents. The plan to condemn homelessness looked at awful without flinching of these residents and made a great deal of wariness about the CAP's actual reason. Cooperation was not met in the manner the CAP had sought after.

2. California:

California in 2017 had a larger than average portion of the country's destitute: 22%, for an express whose occupants just make up 12% of the nation's complete populace. The California State Auditor found in their April 2018 report Homelessness in California, that the U.S. Division of Housing and Urban Development noticed that "California had around 134,000 destitute people, which spoke to around 24 percent of the absolute destitute populace in the country" The California State Auditor is a free government organization answerable for breaking down California financial exercises and afterward giving reports. The Sacramento Bee takes note of that enormous urban areas like Los Angeles and San Francisco both quality their increments in destitute to the lodging lack. In 2017, destitute people in California numbered 135,000 (a 15% expansion from 2015).

The province of California has probably the most elevated centralization of homelessness in the United States. As agrarian relocation's have happened and with urbanization spreading, exact research and information examination will be critical in understanding the significant reasons for homelessness. So as to decide answers for moderate and limit homelessness, humanist, non-government organizations (NGO's), and administrative and state government offices should work all things considered to team up on controlling homelessness, in the territory of California as well as all through the whole United States. Ebb and flow look into has demonstrated that individuals entering homelessness after the age of fifty, become destitute for ecological purposes instead of psychological sickness and substance misuse. As the child of post war America age resigns and lodging costs and budgetary emergency become progressively wild and pervasive, understanding the distinction between natural causes versus conventional causes, for example, psychological maladjustment and illicit drug use will be important.

3. Washington, D.C.

The U.S. Branch of Housing and Urban Development evaluated in 2013 the quantity of destitute in Washington, D.C. as 6,865, which was a 29 percent expansion after 2007. D.C. positions eighth with respect to add up to destitute populace among other significant American urban areas. The city passed a law that requires to give asylum to everyone in need when the temperature dips under solidifying. Since D.C. needs more asylum units accessible, each winter it books lodgings in suburbia with a normal expense around $100 for a night. As indicated by the D.C. Branch of Human Services, throughout the winter of 2012 the city burned through $2,544,454 on placing destitute families in inns and planned $3.2 million on inn beds in 2013. Destitute supporters Mitch Snyder and Eric Sheptock originate from D.C.