Question

INFINITETM = {〈M〉| M is a TM and L(M) is an infinite language}. Is it co-Turing-recognizable?...

INFINITETM = {〈M〉| M is a TM and L(M) is an infinite language}. Is it co-Turing-recognizable? prove your answer.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer:

Let's prove this by Rice's theorem.

INFINITETM is the language of TM descriptions.

Given language satisfies the two conditions of Rice's theorem.

a) It is non-trivial because some TMs have infinite language and others dont have.

b) It depends only on the language.

As we know that of two TMs reconise the same language, either both have descriptions in INFINITETM or neither do.

Consequenty, Rice's theorem implies that INFINITETM does not satisfy co-Turing-recognizable

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Prove that the following language is undecidable: L = { 〈M〉 | M is a Turing...
Prove that the following language is undecidable: L = { 〈M〉 | M is a Turing machine that accepts all strings of length at most 5}
Consider the language defined by L = {aibmcn | i > 0, n > m >...
Consider the language defined by L = {aibmcn | i > 0, n > m > 0 } Is L regular or not? Prove it
5 A Non-Regular language Prove that the language}L={www∣w∈{0,1}​∗​​} is not regular.
5 A Non-Regular language Prove that the language}L={www∣w∈{0,1}​∗​​} is not regular.
For Automata class: Let L be a regular language over the binary alphabet. Consider the following...
For Automata class: Let L be a regular language over the binary alphabet. Consider the following language over the same alphabet: L' = {w | |w| = |u| for some u ∈ L}. Prove that L' is regular.
The chopleft operation of a regular language L is removing the leftmost symbol of every string...
The chopleft operation of a regular language L is removing the leftmost symbol of every string in L: chopleft(L) = { w | vw ∈ L, with |v| = 1}. Prove or disprove that the family of regular languages is closed under the chopleft operation.    Hint: If it’s regular, give an idea of constructing an FA that accepts chopleft(L) using an FA M that accepts L. Otherwise, give a counterexample.
Turing and Wittgenstein seem to agree that if you run into a contradiction, then anything might...
Turing and Wittgenstein seem to agree that if you run into a contradiction, then anything might happen. In other words, any logic that is inconsistent is also trivial in the sense that every sentence may be proved. Could there be a logic in which it is not possible to prove every sentence from a contradiction? What might such a logic look like? Explain your answer.
L = { am b n | m < n - 2}. (a) Define the context...
L = { am b n | m < n - 2}. (a) Define the context free grammar G that generates the formal language L. (b) Define the deterministic pushdown automaton A that recognize the formal language L. (c) Implement the pushdown automaton A in your favorite programming language.
L = { am b n | m < n - 2}. (a) Define the context...
L = { am b n | m < n - 2}. (a) Define the context free grammar G that generates the formal language L. (b) Define the deterministic pushdown automaton A that recognize the formal language L. (c) Implement the pushdown automaton A in your favorite programming language.
Exercise 3. Consider a particle with mass m in a two-dimensional infinite well of length L,...
Exercise 3. Consider a particle with mass m in a two-dimensional infinite well of length L, x, y ∈ [0, L]. There is a weak potential in the well given by V (x, y) = V0L2δ(x − x0)δ(y − y0) . Evaluate the first order correction to the energy of the ground state.    Evaluate the first order corrections to the energy of the first excited states for x0 =y0 = L/4. For the first excited states, find the points...
A particle is confined to the one-dimensional infinite potential well of width L. If the particle...
A particle is confined to the one-dimensional infinite potential well of width L. If the particle is in the n=2 state, what is its probability of detection between a) x=0, and x=L/4; b) x=L/4, and x=3L/4; c) x=3L/4, and x=L? Hint: You can double check your answer if you calculate the total probability of the particle being trapped in the well. Please answer as soon as possible.
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT