Question

Why can we ignore the disposition of the lone pairs on terminal atoms?

Why can we ignore the disposition of the lone pairs on terminal atoms?

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Basically that depends on the shape of the molecule, but in general terms we can just ignore them because they are terminal atoms, and those lone pairs are not contribuing in anything to the molecule. They are just there to do electron repulsion which causes (among other reasons) the shape of the molecule and it's respective hybridation.

Lone pairs are usually electrons pair that are not appealed to anything else, for example for the following molecule:

The molecule has 14 valence electrons. There are four bonding electron pairs around carbon. The shape is tetrahedral. The bond angles will not be exactly 109.5° because the terminal atoms are not all identical. The molecule CH3F is an AX4 species. The lone pairs on the fluorine atom are not considered because it is a terminal atom.

Hope this helps

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
what is the lewis structure for (CH3)2SeO with all electron pairs (lone Pair) on all Atoms...
what is the lewis structure for (CH3)2SeO with all electron pairs (lone Pair) on all Atoms in the molecles
Why do lone pairs of electrons repel other electrons pairs farther away than bonding pairs of...
Why do lone pairs of electrons repel other electrons pairs farther away than bonding pairs of electrons do?
According to VSEPR theory, why are bonds and lone pairs spaced as far as possible?
According to VSEPR theory, why are bonds and lone pairs spaced as far as possible?
Synthesis of Acetanilide a. Sketch a drawing, complete with lone pairs of electrons for your product....
Synthesis of Acetanilide a. Sketch a drawing, complete with lone pairs of electrons for your product. Would you be able to exhaustively alkylate the amino group? Explain your answer. (product is acetanilide) b. Why do you suppose that we added 20mL of deionized water to the reaction mixture? (this was done after removing flask from heat, and then heating the flask again with water before adding charcoal)
1.) An AB4 molecule has two lone pairs of electrons on the A atom (in addition...
1.) An AB4 molecule has two lone pairs of electrons on the A atom (in addition to the four B atoms). What is the electron-domain geometry around the A atom? square pyramidal seesaw T-shaped trigonal pyramidal linear octahedral trigonal planar square planar tetrahedral trigonal bipyramidal bent 2.) For the AB4 molecule in Part B, predict the molecular geometry. T-shaped bent trigonal pyramidal trigonal planar seesaw tetrahedral trigonal bipyramidal square pyramidal square planar octahedral linear
Why is the valence shell electron pair repulsion model used to predict molecular geometry? Lone pair...
Why is the valence shell electron pair repulsion model used to predict molecular geometry? Lone pair repulsion is stronger than bonding pair repulsion. Valence electrons are constantly moving. Lewis structures of molecules can tell the bond strength between atoms. Lone pair electrons of the central atom are attracted to the bonding pair electrons.
Briefly explain, how it is that we can believe that we have accurately counted atoms that...
Briefly explain, how it is that we can believe that we have accurately counted atoms that we cannot actually see with our eyes? it was measuring atomic mass lab with electroplate
10. Why do we no longer accept Dalton’s statement that all atoms of an element       ...
10. Why do we no longer accept Dalton’s statement that all atoms of an element        must be exactly alike?
in atoms, electrons are bound to the nucleus by the coulomb forces. Can we imagine them...
in atoms, electrons are bound to the nucleus by the coulomb forces. Can we imagine them to have a wavelength? Consider an Hydrogen atom for a simplistic picture.
If the discrepancy for binding energy and atomic weight holds, why are we weighing atoms by...
If the discrepancy for binding energy and atomic weight holds, why are we weighing atoms by not there cumulative weight minus the extra weight given by binding energy… Assuming weight attributed to nucleons actually represents them collectively, in experiments during labs at school shouldnt we be using weights that have the bonding force subtracted?