Question

Prove that the square root of 17 is irrational. Subsequently, prove that n times the square...

Prove that the square root of 17 is irrational. Subsequently, prove that n times the square root of 17 is irrational too, for any natural number n.

use the following lemma: Let p be a prime number; if p | a2 then p | a as well. Indicate in your proof the step(s) for which you invoke this lemma. Check for yourself (but you don’t have to include it in your worked solutions) that this need not be true if p is not prime.

Homework Answers

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Prove that the square root of 17 is irrational. Subsequently, prove that n times the square...
Prove that the square root of 17 is irrational. Subsequently, prove that n times the square root of 17 is irrational too, for any natural number n. use the following lemma: Let p be a prime number; if p | a2 then p | a as well. Indicate in your proof the step(s) for which you invoke this lemma. Check for yourself (but you don’t have to include it in your worked solutions) that this need not be true if...
In the style of the proof that square root of 2 is irrational, prove that the...
In the style of the proof that square root of 2 is irrational, prove that the square root of 3 is irrational. Remember, we used a proof by contradiction. You may use the result of Part 1 as a "Lemma" in your proof.
Discrete Structures question In the style we used to show that the square root of 2...
Discrete Structures question In the style we used to show that the square root of 2 is irrational, show that the square root of six is irrational. You should use the following lemma in your proof: If n2 is a multiple of 6, then so is n (for any integer n).
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R...
Let p and q be any two distinct prime numbers and define the relation a R b on integers a,b by: a R b iff b-a is divisible by both p and q. For this relation R: Show that the equivalence classes of R correspond to the elements of  ℤpq. That is: [a] = [b] as equivalence classes of R if and only if [a] = [b] as elements of ℤpq. you may use the following lemma: If p is prime...
Prove that (17)^(1/3) is irrational. You may use the fact that if n^3 is divisible by...
Prove that (17)^(1/3) is irrational. You may use the fact that if n^3 is divisible by 17 then n is divisible by 17
Prove that there is no positive integer n so that 25 < n^2 < 36. Prove...
Prove that there is no positive integer n so that 25 < n^2 < 36. Prove this by directly proving the negation.Your proof must only use integers, inequalities and elementary logic. You may use that inequalities are preserved by adding a number on both sides,or by multiplying both sides by a positive number. You cannot use the square root function. Do not write a proof by contradiction.
Prove that there is no positive integer n so that 25 < n2 < 36. Prove...
Prove that there is no positive integer n so that 25 < n2 < 36. Prove this by directly proving the negation. Your proof must only use integers, inequalities and elementary logic. You may use that inequalities are preserved by adding a number on both sides, or by multiplying both sides by a positive number. You cannot use the square root function. Do not write a proof by contradiction.
Prove that for a square n ×n matrix A, Ax = b (1) has one and...
Prove that for a square n ×n matrix A, Ax = b (1) has one and only one solution if and only if A is invertible; i.e., that there exists a matrix n ×n matrix B such that AB = I = B A. NOTE 01: The statement or theorem is of the form P iff Q, where P is the statement “Equation (1) has a unique solution” and Q is the statement “The matrix A is invertible”. This means...
Prove that there exist n consecutive positive integers each having a (nontrivial) square factor. How would...
Prove that there exist n consecutive positive integers each having a (nontrivial) square factor. How would you then modify your proof so that each of these integers instead has a cube factor (or more generally, a kth power factor where k ≥ 2)? This is a number theory question. Please show all steps and make clear notes about what is happening for a clear understanding. Please write clearly or do in latex. Thank you
Let p=11, q=17, n = pq = 187. Your (awful) public RSA encryption key is (e=107,...
Let p=11, q=17, n = pq = 187. Your (awful) public RSA encryption key is (e=107, n=187). (a) What is your private decryption key? (b) You receive the encrypted message: 100 Decrypt the message. (In other words, what was the original message, before it was encrypted? Just give me a number, don’t convert it to letters).