Question

A building classified as part of PPE is accounted for differently from a building classified as...

A building classified as part of PPE is accounted for differently from a building classified as Investment Property. The cost and fair value models are available for both, but whereas PPE is depreciated under both models, Investment Property is depreciated only under the cost model. Discuss the logic or illogic of these accounting rules.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

Answer Normally a building part as Property, plant and equipment should be classify tangible, fixed, noncurrent assets if it used in production or providing service during business. Than it should be shows at historical cost less depreciation value because it held in business for production of goods or providing services, not for resale. If business invest money in Property, plant and equipment for purpose of no use in production or nor provide service during business   and held as investment than it should be classify as investment (long or short term) head. Because the investment made in building is held for resale. Than it should normally shows as cost value to a long term investment and fair value to a short term investment. However we can get cost and fair value under both situations but purpose are different in both situations.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Part A (7 marks) On 30 June 2018, the statement of financial position of Koala Ltd...
Part A On 30 June 2018, the statement of financial position of Koala Ltd showed the following non- current asset after charging depreciation: Buildings 300,000 Accumulated Depreciation 100,000 Carrying Amount 200,000 The company adopted fair value for the valuation of its non-current assets. This has resulted in the recognition in previous periods of an asset revaluation surplus for the building of $14,000. On 30 June 2019, an independent valuer assessed the fair value of the building to be $160,000. Required...
IFRS U.S. GAAP 4. May use either cost model or revaluation model to a PPE class....
IFRS U.S. GAAP 4. May use either cost model or revaluation model to a PPE class. 4. Require cost model and prohibit revaluation model for PPE. 5. Each part of an item of PPE with a cost that is significant in relation to the total cost shall be depreciated separately 5. Take a ‘holistic view’ of PPE depreciation instead of the IFRS ‘component’ approach. Using the chart above: Discuss which accounting treatment (IFRS, U.S. GAAP, or another new treatment from...
Question 3                                        &nbsp
Question 3                                                                                                      Part A On 30 June 2018, the statement of financial position of Koala Ltd showed the following non- current asset after charging depreciation: Buildings 300,000 Accumulated Depreciation 100,000 Carrying Amount 200,000 The company adopted fair value for the valuation of its non-current assets. This has resulted in the recognition in previous periods of an asset revaluation surplus for the building of $14,000. On 30 June 2019, an independent valuer assessed the fair value of the building to be...
Emaculate owns the following properties at 1 April 2012: Property A: An office building used by...
Emaculate owns the following properties at 1 April 2012: Property A: An office building used by Emaculate for administrative purposes with a depreciated historical cost of $2 million. At 1 April 2012 it had a remaining life of 20 years. After a reorganisation on 1 October 2012, the property was let to a third party and reclassified as an investment property applying Emaculate’s policy of the fair value model. An independent valuer assessed the property to have a fair value...
Your company is considering purchasing a new building as part of an expansion plan. The building...
Your company is considering purchasing a new building as part of an expansion plan. The building cost is $1.5 million. Instead of paying cash for the building out of the business, you plan to borrow $500,000 from your bank via a commercial loan, at a rate of 4.5%. The balance of the building cost will be pulled from your personal investment account, which has averaged only a 1% return the past eight years. The company will pay your personal loan...
Problem One: On January 1, 2015, Weez Ltd acquired a block of land for $100,000, and,...
Problem One: On January 1, 2015, Weez Ltd acquired a block of land for $100,000, and, on the same day, Will Ltd purchased the adjacent, virtually identical block, also for $100,000. Buildings existed on both blocks, and the land and buildings were classified as PP & E by both companies. Also, both companies initially adopted the cost model. The two blocks of land were appraised at $120,000 each on June 30, 2016 and at $180,000 each on June 30, 2017....
Problem One: On January 1, 2015, Weez Ltd acquired a block of land for $100,000, and,...
Problem One: On January 1, 2015, Weez Ltd acquired a block of land for $100,000, and, on the same day, Will Ltd purchased the adjacent, virtually identical block, also for $100,000. Buildings existed on both blocks, and the land and buildings were classified as PP & E by both companies. Also, both companies initially adopted the cost model. The two blocks of land were appraised at $120,000 each on June 30, 2016 and at $180,000 each on June 30, 2017....
Alexis owns a building that originally cost $140,000, has an Undepreciated capital cost (UCC) of $110,000...
Alexis owns a building that originally cost $140,000, has an Undepreciated capital cost (UCC) of $110,000 and Fair Market Value (FMV) of $200,000. Alexis would like to transfer the property to a corporation using the Roll-over provision for a cash payment which she would need for another investment opportunity. As a result, Alexis and the corporation made a Section 85 of Income Tax Act election with respect to the transfer and Alexis received $120,000 cash and preferred shares (P/S) with...
QUESTION 22 According to IAS 39 and IFRS 9, which is true about the classification of...
QUESTION 22 According to IAS 39 and IFRS 9, which is true about the classification of financial assets and financial liabilities? A. Bonds payable should be classified as financial liability measured as fair value B. Held to maturity investments should be classified as financial assets measured as fair value. C. Loans and receivables should be classified as financial assets measured as amortized cost. D. Deposits from customers should be classified as financial liabilities measured as fair value. 10 points   ...
Part A: Multiple Choice Questions In a business combination resulting in a parent company-subsidiary relationship, the...
Part A: Multiple Choice Questions In a business combination resulting in a parent company-subsidiary relationship, the parent company's Investment in Subsidiary Common Stock ledger account balance is: Allocated to individual asset and liability ledger accounts in a parent company journal entry Displayed among noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheet Used as a basis for adjusting the subsidiary's asset and liability account balances in the subsidiary's ledger to current fair values Eliminated with a working paper elimination for the working...