Superior Company manufactures three products using the same production process: tables, benches, and planters. The costs incurred up to the split-off point are $200,000. These costs are allocated to the products on the basis of their sales value at the split-off point. The number of units produced, the selling prices per units at each point in production, and the additional processing costs are as follows:
Product | Number of Units Produced | Selling Price at Split-Off | Selling Price After Processing | Additional Processing Costs |
tables | 2000 | $11.00 | $16.00 | $12,000 |
benches | 5000 | $12.00 | $16.20 | $16,000 |
planters | 3000 | $19.40 | $25.00 | $11,000 |
1) Which information is not relevant to the decision on whether or not to process the products further (1 pt)?
2) Prepare an incremental analysis of the three products (6 pts).
3) Which products should be processed further and which should be sold at the split-off point (2 pts)?
4) Would your decision in #3 be different if the company was using quantity of output to allocate joint costs? Explain (1 pt)
1 | The costs incurred up to the split-off point of $200,000 is not relevant | ||||
to the decision on whether or not to process the products further | |||||
2 | Tables | Benches | Planters | ||
Incremental Revenue | 10000 | 21000 | 16800 | ||
Incremental costs | 12000 | 16000 | 11000 | ||
Incremental Profit / (loss) | -2000 | 5000 | 5800 | ||
3 | Table should be sold at split-off and Benches and Planters should be | ||||
processed further. | |||||
4 | No because joint costs does not have any impact on decision to process | ||||
further | |||||
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.