Bartelt Inc., which produces a single product, the unit production costs have not changed over time. It provided the following data for its most recent month of operations: .Selling price per unit $200 Number of units produced 8,000 Variable costs per unit: Variable production costs (DM+DL+VOH) $150 Variable selling and administrative expense $10 Fixed costs: Fixed manufacturing overhead $60,000 Fixed selling and administrative expense $40,000 19. There was no beginning inventory. The absorption costing unit product cost was: A. $117.50 per unit 3. $150.00 per unit C. $157.50 per unit D. $183.00 per unit 20. The variable costing unit product costs for Bartelt Inc. above was: A. $117.50 per unit B. $150.00 per unit c. $157.50 per unit D. $183.00 per unit 21. The net operating income for the month under variable costing approach for Bartelt Inc. above was: A. 200,000 B. 213,750 c. 249,600 D. 254,600 22. The net operating income for the month under absorption costing for Bartelt Inc. above was: A. The same as the amount reported under the variable costing approach. B. $3,750 more than the amount reported under variable costing approach. C. $3,750 less than the amount reported under variable costing, D. Cannot be determined by the information provided.
1) | unit product cost under Absorption Costing | ||||||||
variable production cost | 150 | ||||||||
fixed manufacturing overhead (60000/8000) | 7.5 | ||||||||
unit product cost under Absorption Costing | 157.5 | ||||||||
option c) | $157.50 | ||||||||
2) | variable costing unit product cost $150 | ||||||||
option B) | $150 | ||||||||
3) | net operating income under variable costing | ||||||||
contribution = selling price - unit product cost -variable selling expense | |||||||||
200-150 - 10 | |||||||||
40 | |||||||||
total contribution margin (7500*40)= | 300000 | ||||||||
less:Fixed expense | |||||||||
fixed manufacturing overhead | 60,000 | ||||||||
Fixed selling & adm expense | 40,000 | 100,000 | |||||||
net operating income | 200,000 | ||||||||
option A) | $200,000 | ||||||||
(since you have not mentioned the units sold or ending inventories | |||||||||
on hand I have assumed that is sold 7500 units) | |||||||||
4) | option b) | ||||||||
$3750 more than the amount reported under variable costing | |||||||||
approach | |||||||||
since fixed overhead will be deferred in ending inventory so | |||||||||
income under absorption costing will be more | |||||||||
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.