Theoretically, could the most devoted altruist in a society also be its richest and happiest member? How? And in what situation would an egoist decide that a lie is morally wrong?
Altruist requires doing acts which increase net happiness for others (or reduce net unhapiness). However there is no way an altruist may know what makes others happy. Moreover, altruist tend to live life which is miserable. Therefore it would not be correcto to say that even the most devoted altruist in a society also be its richest and happiest member.
Egoism means putting your welfare above others’, selfishness is the refusal to see beyond yourself. In a situation where Egoist may decide that a lie is morally wrong when it’s the morally right thing to do; they play by the rules because it’s the smart thing to do. They don’t want to end up rotting in jail.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.