Question

Linda, who is self-employed, purchased a house in 2010 for $220,000 and uses 15% of the...

Linda, who is self-employed, purchased a house in 2010 for $220,000 and uses 15% of the house as an office. The office is used on a regular and exclusive basis and is her principal place of business. Depreciation of $4,000 has been deducted when she sells the house for $400,000. Which of the following statements is not true with regard to these facts?

1. If the office is in a separate structure the gain recognized is $31,000.

2. If the office is not in a separate structure the gain recognized is $4,000.

3. The total gain realized is $184,000 regardless of whether or not the office is in a separate structure.

4. None of the answers provided is correct.

5. The total gain recognized is $4,000 regardless of whether or not the office is in a separate structure.

Homework Answers

Answer #1

With regards to the facts, statements which are Not true and can be treated as false statements are as under

  • If the office is in a separate structure the gain recognized is $31,000.
  • If the office is not in a separate structure the gain recognized is $4,000.
  • ​​​​​​None of the answers provided is correct.
  • The total gain recognized is $4,000 regardless of whether or not the office is in a separate structure.

Only one statement is true that is The total gain realized is $184,000 regardless of whether or not the office is in a separate structure.

As the house was purchased for $220000 and after depreciation of $4000 it would appear $ 220000- $4000= $ 216000 in the books and selling price of house is $400000 than it shows gain of $400000- $216000= $184000

In whole case it doesn't matter that the property is used for any purpose as the house will remain and treated as a hous eonly

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation....
Using the model proposed by Lafley and Charan, analyze how Apigee was able to drive innovation. case:    W17400 APIGEE: PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE CHALLENGE OF GROWTH Ranjeet Nambudiri, S. Ramnarayan, and Catherine Xavier wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be...
QUESTION 1 1. Brianna is trying to increase her chances of being promoted to vice president...
QUESTION 1 1. Brianna is trying to increase her chances of being promoted to vice president by working to build good work relationships with other managers outside her own department. Brianna's behavior should be viewed as dysfunctional politics. functional politics. coercive power. functional influence. 2 points QUESTION 2 1. The Gingerbread Factory has a separate unit that makes their chocolate crunch cookies and another unit that is completely responsible for all operations in producing their ginger snap cookies. The Gingerbread...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary...
Please answer the following Case analysis questions 1-How is New Balance performing compared to its primary rivals? How will the acquisition of Reebok by Adidas impact the structure of the athletic shoe industry? Is this likely to be favorable or unfavorable for New Balance? 2- What issues does New Balance management need to address? 3-What recommendations would you make to New Balance Management? What does New Balance need to do to continue to be successful? Should management continue to invest...
ADVERTISEMENT
Need Online Homework Help?

Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.

Ask a Question
ADVERTISEMENT