A study was conducted to find out whether malaria infection rates in the Amazon differed by region. You use the chisq.test function with these data.
Region |
|||
Infection |
east |
central |
west |
Yes |
5 |
10 |
7 |
No |
50 |
30 |
47 |
Pearson's Chi-squared test
data: infect
X-squared = 4.8759, df = 2, p-value = 0.08734
What are your decision and conclusion (in terms of the populations studied) from the R output (a= 0.05)?
Null hypothesis : Ho malaria infection rates in the Amazon are not differed by region
Alternative Hypothesis : H1: malaria infection rates in the Amazon differed by region
Given,
: level of significance = 0.05
p-value = 0.08734
Decision
As p-value : 0.08734 > : level of significance : 0.05; Fail to reject the null hypothesis : Ho
Conclusion :
At 0.05 level of significance , there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that malaria infection rates in the Amazon differed by region
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.