A survey first taken of 423 workers showed that 189 of them said
that it was seriously unethical to monitor employee e-mail.
Secondly, when 125 senior-level bosses were surveyed, 40 said that
it was seriously unethical to monitor employee e-mail.
a) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that for those
saying that monitoring e-mail is seriously unethical, the
proportion of employees is greater than the proportion of
bosses.
Claim: p1 ---Select--- < > ≤ ≥ ≠ = p2 |
Ho: p1 ---Select--- < > ≤ ≥ ≠ = p2 |
H1: p1 ---Select--- < > ≤ ≥ ≠ = p2 |
b) What is the rejection result?
Do not reject the null hypothesis.Reject the null hypothesis. Not enough information.
c) What is the conclusion?
The sample data does not provide sufficient evidence to support the claim that the proportion of employees is greater than the proportion of bosses.The sample data provides evidence to support the claim that the proportion of employees is greater than the proportion of bosses. The sample data provides sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the proportion of employees is greater than the proportion of bosses.The sample data does not provide sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the proportion of employees is greater than the proportion of bosses.
Solution:
n1 = 423 , x1 = 189
n2 = 125, x2 = 40
Using two proportion test,
a)
significance level = 0.05
claim : those saying that monitoring e-mail is seriously unethical, the proportion of employees is greater than the proportion of bosses.
Claim: p1 > p2 |
Ho: p1 ≤ p2 |
H1: p1 > p2 |
b) What is the rejection result?
Reject the null hypothesis.
c) What is the conclusion?
The sample data provides evidence to support the claim that the proportion of employees is greater than the proportion of bosses.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.