The following paired sample observations are scores for six students chosen at random from Lubbock High School. The "before" scores represent their knowledge of English Literature before they studied the subject for a 2-week period. The "after" scores are their scores after studying English Literature for 2 weeks: | ||||||||||||
Student | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||||
before | 65 | 72 | 55 | 66 | 82 | 90 | ||||||
after | 80 | 78 | 57 | 76 | 91 | 85 | ||||||
At the .05 significance level, can we conclude that there has been an increase in knowledge (as indicated by this exam) as a result of the two-week period of study? | ||||||||||||
Show all 5 steps and explain your conclusion. |
here let d =after -before
Decision:as test statistic falls in rejection region , we reject null hypothesis
Conclusion:We have sufficient evidence at 0.05 level to conclude that there has been an increase in knowledge (as indicated by this exam) as a result of the two-week period of study
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.