An accountant wishes to predict direct labor cost (y) on the basis of the batch size (x) of a product produced in a job shop. Data for 12 production runs are given in the table below, along with the Excel output from fitting a least squares regression line to the data.
Direct Labor Cost Data | |||||
Direct Labor Cost, y ($100s) |
Batch Size, x |
||||
71 | 5 | ||||
663 | 62 | ||||
381 | 35 | ||||
138 | 12 | ||||
861 | 83 | ||||
145 | 14 | ||||
493 | 46 | ||||
548 | 52 | ||||
251 | 23 | ||||
1024 | 100 | ||||
435 | 41 | ||||
772 | 75 | ||||
Click here for the Excel Data File
(a) Calculate b1 and
b0. (Round intermediate steps to 4
decimals places.)
(b) Interpret the meanings of b0 and b1. Does the interpretation of b0 make practical sense?
(c) Write the least squares prediction equation. (Round your answers to 4 decimal places.)
(d) Use the least squares line to obtain a point estimate of the mean direct labor cost for all batches of size 60 and a point prediction of the direct labor cost for an individual batch of size 60. (Round your answer to 3 decimal places.)
a] b1= 10.1463
b0= 18.4875
b] y(hat)= 18.4875+ 10.1463* x
For a unit change in x there will be an increase of 10.1463 unit in dependent variable.
Intercept interpretation: When x= 0 the predicted y will be 10.1463
Intercept interpretation: Since here x=0 then it is saying predicted y will be 10.1463 which is meaningless.
c] y(hat)= 18.4875+ 10.1463* x
d] x=60
y(hat)= 18.4875+ 10.1463* 60
y(hat)= 627.2655
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.