Question

# The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible...

The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let μ denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paint under consideration. A test of H0: μ = 20 versus Ha: μ > 20 will be based on a random sample of size n from a normal population distribution. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations? (Round your P-values to three decimal places.)

(a)    n = 17, t = 3.3, α = 0.05
P-value =

State the conclusion in the problem context.

Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

(b)    n = 10, t = 1.7, α = 0.01
P-value =

State the conclusion in the problem context.

Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

(c)    n = 25,

t = −0.5

P-value =

State the conclusion in the problem context.

Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

This is the right tailed test .

(a)

n = 17, t = 3.3, α = 0.05

P-value = P(t16 > 3.3) = 0.002

Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint

has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

(b)

n = 10, t = 1.7, α = 0.01

P-value = P(t9 > 1.7) = 0.062

Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the

new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

(c)

n = 25,

t = −0.5

P-value = P(t24 > -0.5) = 0.689

Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

#### Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.