Answer the following question based on your observations of the SPSS output file:
Looking at the descriptives (first information), do you see differences in the mean alcohol contents for the three levels of quality? Explain.
Descriptives |
||||||
Alcohol by Volume (in %) for brand |
||||||
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error |
95% Confidence Interval for Mean |
||
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
|||||
VeryGood |
11 |
4.9000 |
.17889 |
.05394 |
4.7798 |
5.0202 |
Good |
14 |
4.6000 |
.38829 |
.10377 |
4.3758 |
4.8242 |
Fair |
10 |
4.5100 |
.34140 |
.10796 |
4.2658 |
4.7542 |
Total |
35 |
4.6686 |
.35295 |
.05966 |
4.5473 |
4.7898 |
Descriptives |
|||
Alcohol by Volume (in %) for brand |
|||
Minimum |
Maximum |
||
VeryGood |
4.70 |
5.20 |
|
Good |
4.00 |
5.50 |
|
Fair |
3.90 |
5.00 |
|
Total |
3.90 |
5.50 |
1.420 |
2 |
32 |
.256 |
ANOVA |
|||||
Alcohol by Volume (in %) for brand |
|||||
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
Between Groups |
.906 |
2 |
.453 |
4.357 |
.021 |
Within Groups |
3.329 |
32 |
.104 |
||
Total |
4.235 |
34 |
From ANOVA table we see that P-value=0.021<0.05 so there is a significant evidence that the mean alcohol contents for the three levels of quality are all not same.
Again 95% CIs for "VeryGood" and "Good" are not completely disjoint so there is an evidence that means of these two levels are not significantly different. Similarly means of levels "Good" and "Fair" are not significantly different. Whereas 95% CIs for "VeryGood" and "Fair" are completely disjoint so there is an evidence that means of these two levels are significantly different.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.