Question

Select a peer-reviewed, experimental research study that exemplifies a two-group design and a factorial design (use keywords method, results, and discussion in your Boolean search). These studies can be found using tools such as the GCU Library and Google Scholar.

Write a 500-750-word paper in which you:

Compare the two research designs.

Identify the independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable.

Identify main effects and interactions for the factorial design.

Explain if the study has a random sample and/or random assignment. Were there other limitations that were noticed?

Answer 1

answer:

• The main examination picked was a correlational report between Social systems administration locales and despondency among its clients, which was a correlational report.
• The second examination checked on was that of PTSD impact of family life, which is a semi exploratory outline (regular analyses)
• The examination outlines appeared to be fitting to their given condition and phenomenas. The first was precise as there was irregular determination of test measure that could help correspond the two factors, in spite of the fact that the causal relationship would be elusive through connection.
• The second one was very proper as the state of PTSD can't be made or potentially instigated inferable from moral models. Thus, a wusi test configuration makes a difference.
• The previous had arbitrary inspecting, the last didn't.