An exercise physiologist records the mile times in seconds for 10 college distance runners before and after a twelve-week training cycle. Is there evidence at the .05 level that the runners' mile times improved (were lower...) following the twelve weeks' training?
Before | After |
249.9 | 250.2 |
278.8 | 266.2 |
254.2 | 244.7 |
261.8 | 252.7 |
238.8 | 237.6 |
267.2 | 269.7 |
267.8 | 256.8 |
259.8 | 263.1 |
254.5 | 252.1 |
255.4 | 243.5 |
1What's the value of the test statistic (based on the After-Before differences)?
2What's the p-value?
3Which of the following is(are) the correct critical value(s)?
4What is the correct decision?
Define , X : Times in seconds for 10 college distance runners after a twelve-week training cycle
Y : Times in seconds for 10 college distance runners before a twelve-week training cycle
Let , d = X-Y
To test :
Test statistic :
Degrees of freedom = 9
Now ,
The value of the test statistic :
b )
c ) Critical value :
d ) We reject H0 if the
Now ,
Hence we reject the null hypothesis or H0 .
Thus we have sufficient evidence to support the claim that the runners' mile times improved (were lower) following the twelve weeks' training .
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.