You are given the following partial Stata output:
regress y x z
Source | SS df MS
-------------+---------------------------------------
Model | 810 1
Residual | 270 19
-------------+----------------------------------------
Total | 1080 20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
y | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x| 9 1.5
z| 6 3.0
Number of obs = 21 F( 2, 18) = Prob > F = R-squared =
Adj R-squared =
Root MSE =
Fill out all the remaining entries in this Stata output. For Prob>F use Stata command Ftail.
We will use below table to calculate remaining entries
Source | SS | DF | MS | F | |
Treatments | SST | k−1 | SST/(k−1) | MST/MSE | |
Error | SSE | N−k | SSE/(N−k) | ||
Total (corrected) | SS | N−1 |
Source | SS | DF | MS | F | |
Treatments | SST=810 | k−1 = 1 | SST/(k−1) = 810/1=810 | MST/MSE=810/14.21=57 | |
Error | SSE=270 | N−k=19 | SSE/(N−k)=270/19=14.21 | ||
Total (corrected) | SS=1080 | N−1=20 |
The test statistic is the F value of 9.59. Using an α of 0.05, we have F0.05;1,19 = 4.38
Since the test statistic is much larger than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis of equal population means and conclude that there is a (statistically) significant difference among the population means.
Hope this will be helpful. Thanks and God Bless You :)
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.