State T OR F?
A)If a null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative at the 1% level, then using the same data, it must be rejected in favor of the alternative at the 5% level.
B)If a null hypothesis is rejected against an alternative at the 5% level and at the 1% level, then you should report that the null was rejected at the 1% significance level. Reporting that it was also rejected at the 5% is redundant and not recommended.
A)
If a null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative at the 1% level, it means that the p-value is less than 0.01
Then using the same data, the p-value would still be less than 0.05, so the null hypothesis must be rejected in favor of the alternative at the 5% level.
Hence True.
B)
If a null hypothesis is rejected against an alternative at the 1% level, it means that the p-value is less than 0.01.
This would imply that the p-value would still be less than 0.05, so the null hypothesis is rejected against an alternative at the 5% level as well.
So, reporting that it was also rejected at the 5% is redundant and not recommended.
Hence True.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.