Data for three selected U.S. regions are presented in the table, along with the percent of the population NOT covered by health insurance during 2000 for each state in that region. Does a relationship exist between these three U.S. regions and health insurance non-coverage?
Table 14.1 Population Uninsured for Three Regions: 2000
West - Pacific |
South – East South Central |
Northeast – New England |
Washington 13.3 |
Kentucky 12.9 |
Maine 11.5 |
Oregon 13.7 |
Tennessee 10.3 |
New Hampshire 6.8 |
California 18.1 |
Alabama 13.5 |
Vermont 10.7 |
Alaska 19.3 |
Mississippi 13.1 |
Massachusetts 9.5 |
Hawaii 10.1 |
Rhode Island 5.9 |
|
Connecticut 7.9 |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, CPS P60-215, Table HI06 – Health Insurance Coverage Status by State for All People: 2000, September 2001.
a) SSB = 106.77, dfb = 2
b) SSB = 100.31, dfb = 12
c) SSB = 66.77, dfb = 2
d) SSB = 100.31, dfb = 2
a) SSW = 87.56, dfw = 10
b) SSW = 87.56, dfw = 11
c) SSW = 87.56, dfw = 12
d) SSW = 97.51, dfw = 12
a) 2.76
b) 3.18
c) 3.89
d) 7.88
6. What is your F (obtained)? Determine its level of significance. Based on an alpha level of .05, what can you conclude about the relationship between region and health insurance non-coverage?
Data for three selected U.S. regions are presented in the table, along with the percent of the population NOT covered by health insurance during 2000 for each state in that region. Does a relationship exist between these three U.S. regions and health insurance non-coverage?
Table 14.1 Population Uninsured for Three Regions: 2000
West - Pacific |
South – East South Central |
Northeast – New England |
Washington 13.3 |
Kentucky 12.9 |
Maine 11.5 |
Oregon 13.7 |
Tennessee 10.3 |
New Hampshire 6.8 |
California 18.1 |
Alabama 13.5 |
Vermont 10.7 |
Alaska 19.3 |
Mississippi 13.1 |
Massachusetts 9.5 |
Hawaii 10.1 |
Rhode Island 5.9 |
|
Connecticut 7.9 |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, CPS P60-215, Table HI06 – Health Insurance Coverage Status by State for All People: 2000, September 2001.
a) SSB = 106.77, dfb = 2
b) SSB = 100.31, dfb = 12
c) SSB = 66.77, dfb = 2
d) SSB = 100.31, dfb = 2
a) SSW = 87.56, dfw = 10
b) SSW = 87.56, dfw = 11
c) SSW = 87.56, dfw = 12
d) SSW = 97.51, dfw = 12
a) 2.76
b) 3.18
c) 3.89
d) 7.88
6. What is your F (obtained)? Determine its level of significance. Based on an alpha level of .05, what can you conclude about the relationship between region and health insurance non-coverage?
1) dependnet variable =three US regions
Independnent variable = health insurance non-coverage
-------------------
treatment | A | B | C |
count, ni = | 5 | 4 | 6 |
mean , x̅ i = | 14.900 | 12.45 | 8.717 |
===============
ANOVA | ||||||
Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit |
Between Groups | 106.77 | 2 | 53.39 | 7.317 | 0.008 | 3.89 |
Within Groups | 87.56 | 12 | 7.30 | |||
Total | 194.33 | 14 |
a) SSB = 106.77, dfb = 2
c) SSW = 87.56, dfw = 12
F critical= c) 3.89
F obtained = 7.317
reject Ho
you conclude about the relationship that there ia significant difference between region and health insurance non-coverage
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.