Frequency
Write two sentences indicating why you think the results bellow of are nominal and scale measurement level. Keep in mind that we’re only considering what SPSS calls the valid responses. The missing responses represent missing data (e.g., don’t know or no answer responses)
RESPONDENT'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE |
|||||
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
||
Valid |
PROTESTANT |
1087 |
42.8 |
43.2 |
43.2 |
CATHOLIC |
639 |
25.2 |
25.4 |
68.5 |
|
JEWISH |
38 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
70.0 |
|
NONE |
520 |
20.5 |
20.7 |
90.7 |
|
OTHER |
27 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
91.8 |
|
BUDDHISM |
27 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
92.8 |
|
HINDUISM |
15 |
.6 |
.6 |
93.4 |
|
OTHER EASTERN |
6 |
.2 |
.2 |
93.7 |
|
MOSLEM/ISLAM |
9 |
.4 |
.4 |
94.0 |
|
ORTHODOX-CHRISTIAN |
10 |
.4 |
.4 |
94.5 |
|
OTHER CHRISTIAN |
135 |
5.3 |
5.4 |
99.8 |
|
NATIVE AMERICAN |
2 |
.1 |
.1 |
99.9 |
|
INTER-NONDENOMINATIONAL |
3 |
.1 |
.1 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
2518 |
99.2 |
100.0 |
||
Missing |
DK |
5 |
.2 |
||
NA |
14 |
.6 |
|||
Total |
20 |
.8 |
|||
Total |
2538 |
100.0 |
UNRECODED PROTESTANT DENOMINATION |
|||||
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
||
Valid |
AM BAPTIST ASSO |
22 |
.9 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
AM BAPT CH IN USA |
15 |
.6 |
1.3 |
3.1 |
|
NAT BAPT CONV OF AM |
11 |
.4 |
.9 |
4.0 |
|
NAT BAPT CONV USA |
3 |
.1 |
.2 |
4.2 |
|
SOUTHERN BAPTIST |
138 |
5.4 |
11.3 |
15.6 |
|
OTHER BAPTISTS |
21 |
.8 |
1.7 |
17.2 |
|
BAPTIST-DK WHICH |
136 |
5.4 |
11.2 |
28.4 |
|
AFR METH EPISCOPAL |
6 |
.3 |
.5 |
28.9 |
|
AFR METH EP ZION |
4 |
.2 |
.3 |
29.3 |
|
UNITED METHODIST |
110 |
4.3 |
9.0 |
38.3 |
|
OTHER METHODIST |
4 |
.1 |
.3 |
38.6 |
|
METHODIST-DK WHICH |
18 |
.7 |
1.5 |
40.1 |
|
AM LUTHERAN |
10 |
.4 |
.8 |
40.9 |
|
LUTH CH IN AMERICA |
5 |
.2 |
.4 |
41.3 |
|
LUTHERAN-MO SYNOD |
22 |
.9 |
1.8 |
43.1 |
|
WI EVAN LUTH SYNOD |
4 |
.2 |
.4 |
43.5 |
|
OTHER LUTHERAN |
3 |
.1 |
.2 |
43.7 |
|
EVANGELICAL LUTH |
15 |
.6 |
1.3 |
45.0 |
|
LUTHERAN-DK WHICH |
26 |
1.0 |
2.1 |
47.1 |
|
PRESBYTERIAN C IN US |
8 |
.3 |
.6 |
47.7 |
|
UNITED PRES CH IN US |
8 |
.3 |
.6 |
48.4 |
|
OTHER PRESBYTERIAN |
3 |
.1 |
.2 |
48.6 |
|
PRESBYTERIAN, MERGED |
11 |
.4 |
.9 |
49.5 |
|
PRESBYTERIAN-DK WH |
31 |
1.2 |
2.5 |
52.0 |
|
EPISCOPAL |
33 |
1.3 |
2.7 |
54.7 |
|
OTHER |
254 |
10.0 |
20.9 |
75.6 |
|
NO DENOMINATION |
298 |
11.7 |
24.4 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
1219 |
48.0 |
100.0 |
||
Missing |
IAP |
1302 |
51.3 |
||
DK |
2 |
.1 |
|||
NA |
14 |
.6 |
|||
Total |
1319 |
52.0 |
|||
Total |
2538 |
100.0 |
Here, we have to discuss the scale of measurements for the given results from SPSS. From the given SPSS results it is observed that results are obtained from the nominal scale measurement level data. The given frequency distribution explains the frequency and percentage of the respondent’s religious preference. The question asked to respondents is “what is your religious preference?” or “what is your religion?” Respondents included in the survey provided the answers or responses as the names of different religions. So, the collected data is nothing but the set of different names of religions. This means that the collected data do not contain any numbers and it only contains the name of the different religions such as Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, etc. So, names in the dataset represent the nominal level of measurements.
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.