The proportion of cars stolen that do not have a burglar alarm installed is 10% in a sample of 40 cars. The proportion of cars stolen that do have a burglar alarm installed is 5%, also in a sample of 40 cars. What would be the conclusion at α = 0.05 if you want to claim that the proportion of cars that do not have a burglar alarm installed is more than the proportion of cars with burglar alarms installed?
Accept H0, because the test statistic is less than 1.65. |
||
Accept H0, because the test statistic is less than 1.96. |
||
Reject H0, because the test statistic is more than 1.65. |
||
Reject H0, because the test statistic is more than 1.96 |
p1cap = X1/N1 = 4/40 = 0.1
p1cap = X2/N2 = 2/40 = 0.05
pcap = (X1 + X2)/(N1 + N2) = (4+2)/(40+40) = 0.075
Below are the null and alternative Hypothesis,
Null Hypothesis, H0: p1 = p2
Alternate Hypothesis, Ha: p1 > p2
Rejection Region
This is right tailed test, for α = 0.05
Critical value of z is 1.64.
Hence reject H0 if z > 1.64
Test statistic
z = (p1cap - p2cap)/sqrt(pcap * (1-pcap) * (1/N1 + 1/N2))
z = (0.1-0.05)/sqrt(0.075*(1-0.075)*(1/40 + 1/40))
z = 0.85
Option A
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 1 hours.