Question

It is alleged that there is discrimination against blacks in grand jury selection. Some survey suggested...

It is alleged that there is discrimination against blacks in grand jury selection. Some survey suggested that 24% of those eligible for grand jury service were black. However inspecting a random sample of 1100 called to appear for possible jury duty, we found only 229 were blacks. Suppose we want to test the survey's claim against the alternative that the actual proportion of blacks called for jury duty is less than what the survey suggests.

1.Rejection region: We reject H0 at 1% level of significance if: ( b is not correct )
a)z > 2.326.
b) |z| > 2.576.
c) z < −2.326.
d) None of the above.

2. The value of the test-statistic is: Answer to 3 decimal places.(-2.329 was not correct)

3. The p-value of the test is equal to: Answer to 4 decimal places. (0.0099 was not correct)

Homework Answers

Answer #1

H0: p = 0.24

Ha: p < 0.24

a)

For left tailed test,

Z critical value at 0.01 significance level = -2.326

Rejection rule = Reject H0 if z < -2.326

b)

Sample proportion = 229 / 1100 = 0.2082

Test statistics

z = ( - p) / sqrt [ p( 1 - p) / n ]

= ( 0.2082 - 0.24) / sqrt ( 0.24 ( 1 - 0.24) / 1100 ]

= -2.470

c)

p-value = P(Z < z)

= P(Z < -2.470)

= 0.0068

Since p-value < 0.01 significance level, Reject H0.

Know the answer?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for?
Ask your own homework help question
Similar Questions
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...